Making things difficult for patients, to make things easy for the doctor? The problems functional urology patients experience in providing information ahead of their doctor's appointment

In functional urology, efficiency is sought by asking patients to complete questionnaires before their appointment to evaluate their symptoms. This is difficult for a large number of patients, according to research on the IPSS and bladder diaries. In this review article, we describe the threats to the validity and thus the usability of these questionnaires. Making questionnaires easier to understand and involving the target group in the development of the questionnaires can improve the quality of information from the patient to the medical professional. • A number of patients have difficulty understanding and completing questionnaires • Comprehension problems pose a threat to the validity of questionnaires • Spoken animations appear to be the best way to inform low health literate patients • Patient involvement in questionnaire development is essential

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Continence Reports
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contre.2025.100102
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making things difficult for patients, to make things easy for the doctor? The problems functional urology patients experience in providing information ahead of their doctor's appointment

F.W.M. Schlatmann, M.L. van Poelgeest–Pomfret, M.R. van Balken
Continence Reports
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Making things difficult for patients, to make things easy for the doctor? The problems functional urology patients experience in providing information ahead of their doctor's appointment

F.W.M. Schlatmann, M.L. van Poelgeest–Pomfret, M.R. van Balken
article en

Abstract

In functional urology, efficiency is sought by asking patients to complete questionnaires before their appointment to evaluate their symptoms. This is difficult for a large number of patients, according to research on the IPSS and bladder diaries. In this review article, we describe the threats to the validity and thus the usability of these questionnaires. Making questionnaires easier to understand and involving the target group in the development of the questionnaires can improve the quality of information from the patient to the medical professional. • A number of patients have difficulty understanding and completing questionnaires • Comprehension problems pose a threat to the validity of questionnaires • Spoken animations appear to be the best way to inform low health literate patients • Patient involvement in questionnaire development is essential

Continence ReportsVol. 17
Spaarne Ziekenhuis (NL), Rijnstate Hospital (NL), World Federation for Mental Health (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.