Concave generalized utilitarianism and well-being comparability

Abstract The paper investigates generalized utilitarian social orderings based on sums of concavely transformed individual well-being levels. It offers a unified analysis of these orderings in a framework based on a single profile of utility functions. The paper discusses approaches to specify the utility profile and distinguishes different types of generalized utilitarian orderings. It provides characterizations of concave generalized utilitarian orderings with equity, weak separability, and compensation conditions. Existing and new compensation properties are closely related to continuity. The paper in turn examines two attempts to justify utilitarianism. The first one employs a substantive invariance requirement on social evaluation. The second one is based on a new stability condition and neither needs anonymity nor separability assumptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Decision
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-025-10094-4
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concave generalized utilitarianism and well-being comparability

Robert Raschka
Theory and Decision
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Concave generalized utilitarianism and well-being comparability

Robert Raschka
article en

Abstract

Abstract The paper investigates generalized utilitarian social orderings based on sums of concavely transformed individual well-being levels. It offers a unified analysis of these orderings in a framework based on a single profile of utility functions. The paper discusses approaches to specify the utility profile and distinguishes different types of generalized utilitarian orderings. It provides characterizations of concave generalized utilitarian orderings with equity, weak separability, and compensation conditions. Existing and new compensation properties are closely related to continuity. The paper in turn examines two attempts to justify utilitarianism. The first one employs a substantive invariance requirement on social evaluation. The second one is based on a new stability condition and neither needs anonymity nor separability assumptions.

Theory and Decision
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.