Global prevalence of neonatal mortality in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The leading cause of neonatal mortality is preterm birth, with the risk of death in the first days of life increasing as the gestational age decreases. The objective was to estimates the global prevalence of neonatal mortality in preterms through a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Observational cohort studies were included irrespective of temporal or linguistic confines. Studies reporting the prevalence of newborns delivered before 37 complete weeks of gestation, with deaths within 28 days postpartum, were included. The bibliographic search and selection were conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, SciVerse Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL Information Systems, Scientific Electronic Library Online, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature and gray literature. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool. Meta-analysis was conducted utilizing RStudio software. A total of 47 articles were included. Of them, 29 studies analyzed general preterm birth (delivery before 37 complete weeks of gestation), three studies evaluated extremely preterm (< 28 weeks), seven studies assessed very preterm (28 to less than 32 weeks), and five studies examined moderate to late preterm infants (32 to 37 weeks). The pooled prevalence of neonatal mortality was 8%. When considering only the subgroup of general preterm, the mortality rate was 10%. Extremely preterm infants had a mortality rate of 40%, very preterm infants had a rate of 15%, and moderate to late preterm infants had a mortality rate close to 0%. High heterogeneity was found (I² = 100%; Q-test p = 0; wide prediction interval). Meta-regression analyses were conducted to examine the observed heterogeneity. Factors such as Human Development Index and admission to NICUs influenced neonatal mortality. In terms of quality assessment, 89.1% of the studies were considered adequate in representing the target population. Regarding sample size, 30.4% of studies lacked calculations, hindering evaluation. The prevalence of neonatal mortality was 8 per 100 premature births. The prevalence of neonatal mortality varied according to gestational age at birth. These data should be interpreted with caution as it was not possible to identify all sources of heterogeneity in the meta-analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-08490-3
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global prevalence of neonatal mortality in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Juliana Schaia Rocha Orsi, Caroline Souza dos Santos, Ângela Leite Mendes, Michelle de Fátima Tavares Alves et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
article

Global prevalence of neonatal mortality in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Juliana Schaia Rocha Orsi, Caroline Souza dos Santos, Ângela Leite Mendes, Michelle de Fátima Tavares Alves, Mário Vianna Vettore, Everson Ribeiro de Lima, Samuel Jorge Moysés, Isabela Cristina Santos Freire De Paula, Renata Iani Werneck, Ádelin Olívia Lopes Joly Rodrigues, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo
article en

Abstract

The leading cause of neonatal mortality is preterm birth, with the risk of death in the first days of life increasing as the gestational age decreases. The objective was to estimates the global prevalence of neonatal mortality in preterms through a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Observational cohort studies were included irrespective of temporal or linguistic confines. Studies reporting the prevalence of newborns delivered before 37 complete weeks of gestation, with deaths within 28 days postpartum, were included. The bibliographic search and selection were conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, SciVerse Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL Information Systems, Scientific Electronic Library Online, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature and gray literature. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool. Meta-analysis was conducted utilizing RStudio software. A total of 47 articles were included. Of them, 29 studies analyzed general preterm birth (delivery before 37 complete weeks of gestation), three studies evaluated extremely preterm (< 28 weeks), seven studies assessed very preterm (28 to less than 32 weeks), and five studies examined moderate to late preterm infants (32 to 37 weeks). The pooled prevalence of neonatal mortality was 8%. When considering only the subgroup of general preterm, the mortality rate was 10%. Extremely preterm infants had a mortality rate of 40%, very preterm infants had a rate of 15%, and moderate to late preterm infants had a mortality rate close to 0%. High heterogeneity was found (I² = 100%; Q-test p = 0; wide prediction interval). Meta-regression analyses were conducted to examine the observed heterogeneity. Factors such as Human Development Index and admission to NICUs influenced neonatal mortality. In terms of quality assessment, 89.1% of the studies were considered adequate in representing the target population. Regarding sample size, 30.4% of studies lacked calculations, hindering evaluation. The prevalence of neonatal mortality was 8 per 100 premature births. The prevalence of neonatal mortality varied according to gestational age at birth. These data should be interpreted with caution as it was not possible to identify all sources of heterogeneity in the meta-analysis.

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthVol. 25(1)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR), Aarhus University (DK), Centro Universitário Curitiba (BR), Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná (BR), Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Araucária
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.