Exploration and practice of energy efficiency under natural gas well drainage and gas production process method

Natural gas, as a key fossil fuel, plays a vital role in the energy industry. This paper explores three drainage and gas production technologies - foam drainage, beam pumping unit deep well pump drainage, and gas lift drainage - with a focus on improving energy efficiency. By analysing experimental data, the study compares their performance in terms of cost and efficiency. At a drainage depth of 200 m, foam drainage was found to be the most cost-effective, reducing gas production costs by 170.02 yuan and 183.9 yuan compared to the other two methods. While energy efficiency among the three methods showed little difference, foam drainage is recommended for its lower cost, contributing to energy savings and technological advancement in natural gas production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Global Energy Issues
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijgei.2026.150712
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploration and practice of energy efficiency under natural gas well drainage and gas production process method

Yunjie Cai, Chi Yao, Junhan Li, Yang Li et al.
International Journal of Global Energy Issues
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
article

Exploration and practice of energy efficiency under natural gas well drainage and gas production process method

Yunjie Cai, Chi Yao, Junhan Li, Yang Li, Haijian Li
article en

Abstract

Natural gas, as a key fossil fuel, plays a vital role in the energy industry. This paper explores three drainage and gas production technologies - foam drainage, beam pumping unit deep well pump drainage, and gas lift drainage - with a focus on improving energy efficiency. By analysing experimental data, the study compares their performance in terms of cost and efficiency. At a drainage depth of 200 m, foam drainage was found to be the most cost-effective, reducing gas production costs by 170.02 yuan and 183.9 yuan compared to the other two methods. While energy efficiency among the three methods showed little difference, foam drainage is recommended for its lower cost, contributing to energy savings and technological advancement in natural gas production.

International Journal of Global Energy IssuesVol. 48(1/2)
Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) (CN), SGIDI Engineering Consulting (China) (CN), Shanghai Architectural Design & Research Institute (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.