Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome show increased reliance on vision in reaching-to-grasp: a study of in-flight grasp kinematics in compressive nerve injury

The fluid efficiency of everyday hand actions such as reaching-to-grasp is underpinned by finely calibrated, anticipatory, in-flight control of the hand. Peripheral nerve dysfunction could affect this control. We used carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), a compressive neuropathy of the median nerve, as a model of nerve dysfunction. Whether CTS affects in-flight aspects of reaching-to-grasp is unknown. We compared kinematics of movements in CTS and healthy controls, using motion capture. We varied object properties to determine whether anticipatory signatures of reaching-to-grasp are preserved in CTS. We also examined the effect of removing visual feedback at movement onset. This manipulation forces greater reliance on non-visual control signals, which should highlight impairments due to CTS, while indexing how much movements rely on vision. Participants also completed standardized clinical tests of sensorimotor function. Reaching-to-grasp in CTS showed normal anticipatory signatures, including reliable scaling of movement speed and hand opening with object distance and size, respectively. Removing visual feedback caused both patients and controls to increase hand opening by similar amounts, to compensate for increased probability of errors. Distinct from controls, however, patients with CTS also showed slower movement speeds and longer movement onset times without visual feedback. These CTS-specific responses suggest that CTS causes greater reliance on vision for reaching-to-grasp. They also demonstrate adaptive compensation for nerve dysfunction (consistent with normative, statistical-decision-theoretic accounts of movement control). The qualitative similarity of reaching-to-grasp in CTS and controls suggests that normal control processes are preserved in moderate peripheral nerve dysfunction, taking the effects of injury into account appropriately.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We provide the first experimental data on how carpal tunnel syndrome affects in-flight, anticipatory aspects of reaching-to-grasp movements. Our results show that movements in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome are more reliant on vision than those of healthy controls. Moreover, the differences appear to reflect compensatory changes designed to control the risk of making errors. Our findings suggest that reaching-to-grasp movements in peripheral nerve injury use normal control processes, and appropriately factor-in the effects of injury.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00228.2025
Primary Topic
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome show increased reliance on vision in reaching-to-grasp: a study of in-flight grasp kinematics in compressive nerve injury

Michela Paroli, Edward Cornish, Kenneth F. Valyear, Simon J. Watt et al.
Journal of Neurophysiology
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
article

Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome show increased reliance on vision in reaching-to-grasp: a study of in-flight grasp kinematics in compressive nerve injury

Michela Paroli, Edward Cornish, Kenneth F. Valyear, Simon J. Watt, Edwin Prashanth Jesudason, Kathryn S. S. Dayananda
article en

Abstract

The fluid efficiency of everyday hand actions such as reaching-to-grasp is underpinned by finely calibrated, anticipatory, in-flight control of the hand. Peripheral nerve dysfunction could affect this control. We used carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), a compressive neuropathy of the median nerve, as a model of nerve dysfunction. Whether CTS affects in-flight aspects of reaching-to-grasp is unknown. We compared kinematics of movements in CTS and healthy controls, using motion capture. We varied object properties to determine whether anticipatory signatures of reaching-to-grasp are preserved in CTS. We also examined the effect of removing visual feedback at movement onset. This manipulation forces greater reliance on non-visual control signals, which should highlight impairments due to CTS, while indexing how much movements rely on vision. Participants also completed standardized clinical tests of sensorimotor function. Reaching-to-grasp in CTS showed normal anticipatory signatures, including reliable scaling of movement speed and hand opening with object distance and size, respectively. Removing visual feedback caused both patients and controls to increase hand opening by similar amounts, to compensate for increased probability of errors. Distinct from controls, however, patients with CTS also showed slower movement speeds and longer movement onset times without visual feedback. These CTS-specific responses suggest that CTS causes greater reliance on vision for reaching-to-grasp. They also demonstrate adaptive compensation for nerve dysfunction (consistent with normative, statistical-decision-theoretic accounts of movement control). The qualitative similarity of reaching-to-grasp in CTS and controls suggests that normal control processes are preserved in moderate peripheral nerve dysfunction, taking the effects of injury into account appropriately.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We provide the first experimental data on how carpal tunnel syndrome affects in-flight, anticipatory aspects of reaching-to-grasp movements. Our results show that movements in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome are more reliant on vision than those of healthy controls. Moreover, the differences appear to reflect compensatory changes designed to control the risk of making errors. Our findings suggest that reaching-to-grasp movements in peripheral nerve injury use normal control processes, and appropriately factor-in the effects of injury.

Journal of NeurophysiologyVol. 135(2)
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (GB), Bangor University (GB), University Hospital of Wales (GB), Stepping Hill Hospital (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.