Visual Quality Assessment of Rural Landscapes Based on Eye-Tracking Analysis and Subjective Perception

Traditional visual quality assessments of rural landscapes rely on subjective methods. This study integrates eye-tracking technology with subjective perception evaluation to construct a visual quality assessment model for rural landscapes, aiming to reveal the intrinsic relationship between objective visual behavior and subjective perception, with the aim of providing scientific guidance for rural landscape planning to promote sustainable rural development. Using landscape photographs from nine rural sampling sites in Guangzhou, eye-tracking experiments were conducted to collect participants’ eye movement data, combined with online questionnaires to obtain scenic beauty ratings and landscape characteristic factor evaluations. The findings reveal the following: (1) Eye-tracking experiments and subjective evaluation results showed high consistency, with samples having higher scenic beauty ratings demonstrating more prominent performance in core eye movement indicators such as total fixation duration and count, and total saccade duration, and typically possessing higher landscape characteristic factor values. (2) Urban–suburban-integrated rural landscapes exhibited poorer visual quality, characteristic-preservation rural landscapes elicited more in-depth and sustained visual exploration, and clustered-improvement rural landscapes possessed higher scenic beauty ratings and landscape characteristic factor values. (3) Total saccade duration was the key eye movement indicator for predicting scenic beauty ratings. (4) Multiple landscape characteristic factors significantly influence eye movement behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010161
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual Quality Assessment of Rural Landscapes Based on Eye-Tracking Analysis and Subjective Perception

Siqi Sun, Yu Li, Hao Luo, Kun Wang et al.
Sustainability
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Visual Quality Assessment of Rural Landscapes Based on Eye-Tracking Analysis and Subjective Perception

Siqi Sun, Yu Li, Hao Luo, Kun Wang, Qing Zhao
article en

Abstract

Traditional visual quality assessments of rural landscapes rely on subjective methods. This study integrates eye-tracking technology with subjective perception evaluation to construct a visual quality assessment model for rural landscapes, aiming to reveal the intrinsic relationship between objective visual behavior and subjective perception, with the aim of providing scientific guidance for rural landscape planning to promote sustainable rural development. Using landscape photographs from nine rural sampling sites in Guangzhou, eye-tracking experiments were conducted to collect participants’ eye movement data, combined with online questionnaires to obtain scenic beauty ratings and landscape characteristic factor evaluations. The findings reveal the following: (1) Eye-tracking experiments and subjective evaluation results showed high consistency, with samples having higher scenic beauty ratings demonstrating more prominent performance in core eye movement indicators such as total fixation duration and count, and total saccade duration, and typically possessing higher landscape characteristic factor values. (2) Urban–suburban-integrated rural landscapes exhibited poorer visual quality, characteristic-preservation rural landscapes elicited more in-depth and sustained visual exploration, and clustered-improvement rural landscapes possessed higher scenic beauty ratings and landscape characteristic factor values. (3) Total saccade duration was the key eye movement indicator for predicting scenic beauty ratings. (4) Multiple landscape characteristic factors significantly influence eye movement behavior.

SustainabilityVol. 18(1)
Northeast Agricultural University (CN), Guangdong Academy of Forestry (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.