From Inclusive Research to Inclusive Evaluation: Empowering People with Intellectual Disabilities to Shape the Services They Use

This article explores how people with intellectual disabilities can be more involved in evaluating and regulating the services they use and the quality of their lives. Traditionally, these evaluations have been performed by professionals, but we argue that people with lived experience of intellectual disabilities bring unique insights and should be part of the process. The idea builds on ‘inclusive research’, where people with intellectual disabilities are not just subjects of research but active researchers. We use the term ‘inclusive evaluation’, to describe the active engagement of people with intellectual disabilities in inspecting and assessing services to ensure they meet standards and respect human rights. The paper describes a small exploratory study involving interviews with regulators, professionals, and people with intellectual disabilities across Ireland, Northern Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand who had been involved in inclusive evaluations. It found strong support for it, highlighting benefits such as greater trust and empathy during evaluations with users of services, more meaningful feedback for service providers, and increased confidence and employment opportunities for evaluators with disabilities. However, challenges remain, including funding and fair pay for the engagement of people with intellectual disabilities, training opportunities that meet the support needs of all stakeholders, and changing the cultural attitudes in support services that underestimate the abilities of people with intellectual disabilities. Steps to overcome these challenges are proposed such as piloting inclusive evaluation programmes, providing inclusive evaluation training to all involved, and lobbying governments to fund these roles. We conclude with a proposed implementation framework and a set of guiding principles that will nurture a spirit of inclusion and respect in service evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15010004
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Inclusive Research to Inclusive Evaluation: Empowering People with Intellectual Disabilities to Shape the Services They Use

Patricia O’Brien, Bruce O’Brien, Roy McConkey, Sarah Butler et al.
Social Sciences
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

From Inclusive Research to Inclusive Evaluation: Empowering People with Intellectual Disabilities to Shape the Services They Use

Patricia O’Brien, Bruce O’Brien, Roy McConkey, Sarah Butler, Edurne Garcia Iriarte
article en

Abstract

This article explores how people with intellectual disabilities can be more involved in evaluating and regulating the services they use and the quality of their lives. Traditionally, these evaluations have been performed by professionals, but we argue that people with lived experience of intellectual disabilities bring unique insights and should be part of the process. The idea builds on ‘inclusive research’, where people with intellectual disabilities are not just subjects of research but active researchers. We use the term ‘inclusive evaluation’, to describe the active engagement of people with intellectual disabilities in inspecting and assessing services to ensure they meet standards and respect human rights. The paper describes a small exploratory study involving interviews with regulators, professionals, and people with intellectual disabilities across Ireland, Northern Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand who had been involved in inclusive evaluations. It found strong support for it, highlighting benefits such as greater trust and empathy during evaluations with users of services, more meaningful feedback for service providers, and increased confidence and employment opportunities for evaluators with disabilities. However, challenges remain, including funding and fair pay for the engagement of people with intellectual disabilities, training opportunities that meet the support needs of all stakeholders, and changing the cultural attitudes in support services that underestimate the abilities of people with intellectual disabilities. Steps to overcome these challenges are proposed such as piloting inclusive evaluation programmes, providing inclusive evaluation training to all involved, and lobbying governments to fund these roles. We conclude with a proposed implementation framework and a set of guiding principles that will nurture a spirit of inclusion and respect in service evaluations.

Social SciencesVol. 15(1)
Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Ulster (GB), Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.