Coping during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a qualitative study of organizational resilience in an English substance use support service
<b>Introduction</b>: The COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented challenges to health and care services, including substance use support, necessitating adaptations to maintain operational continuity. A lack of research exists into the factors that helped substance use services cope and maintain provision. This study aimed to elucidate the organizational resilience factors that assisted a substance use support service in sustaining operations and adapting during the COVID-19 pandemic. <br/><b><br/>Theory</b>: The study draws on recent conceptual and theoretical developments in the study of organizational resilience, examining findings primarily through the lens of bounce-back and bounce-forward resilience, and Duchek’s three-stage framework. <br/><b><br/>Method</b>: Participants were 36 staff members working for (n = 28) or in partnership with (n = 8) an organization delivering substance use support services across an area of northern England. A multi-method qualitative approach, including digital timelines (n = 19), in-depth interviews (n = 18), and five focus groups (n = 17), was employed. Timeline text was treated as qualitative text-based data. Interviews and focus groups were recorded and transcribed prior to coding. Data underwent Framework Analysis. <br/><b><br/>Results</b>: Seven themes were identified: 1) pre-existing relationships and effective multiagency working; 2) prioritization of service delivery; 3) development and implementation of guidance and protocols; 4) autonomy, devolution, and deference to expertise; 5) effective communication, regular meetings, and coordinated decision-making; 6) allowing flexibility and creativity; and 7) development of new and innovative approaches to facilitate the pandemic response. <br/><b><br/>Discussion</b>: This study identifies resilience factors that substance use and other support organizations should focus on in preparation for potential future crises, to minimise adverse impacts on vulnerable populations.
Authors
- Nigel Smeeton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-5411)
- Jaime García-Iglesias (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-5635)
- Suzanne Bartington (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8179-7618)
- Katie Newby (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9348-0116)
- David Wellsted (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2895-7838)
- Wendy Wills (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7127-6045)
- Imogen Freethy
- Charis Bontoft (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9577-6773)
- Nigel Lloyd (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-1957)
- Neil Howlett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6502-9969)
- Gavin Breslin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2481-0860)
- Amander Wellings
- Olujoke Fakoya
- Katherine Brown
- Julia Jones
Institutions
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- University of Hertfordshire (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Critical Public Health
- Published
- 2025-12-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2604392
- Primary Topic
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00