Proposing a “PICO” for evidence implementation projects: the Problem, Implementation/Intervention, Evaluation, Context, and Engagement (PIECE) approach

This article explores the development and utility of the PIECE (Practice/Problem of interest, Intervention/Implementation, Evaluation, Context, and Engagement) planning and question framework as a structured approach for planning and conducting evidence implementation projects. Traditionally, the PICO model has been used as a guiding framework for formulating clinical questions and structuring systematic reviews; however, the elements of PICO do not suit the unique requirements of evidence implementation projects in real-world settings. Each element of PIECE addresses a critical component of implementation: selecting a problem grounded in evidence, choosing effective interventions, defining evaluation metrics, assessing contextual factors, and engaging relevant stakeholders. Through examples of successful JBI implementation projects, we illustrate how PIECE can be used to conceptualize and execute implementation efforts. The proposed framework provides a structured yet flexible roadmap, allowing health care teams to initiate and sustain meaningful improvements. PIECE supports the planning phase of implementation projects, fostering better alignment with organizational goals and greater stakeholder engagement. As implementation science continues to evolve, PIECE offers a grounded approach for clinicians seeking to embed evidence into daily practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBI Evidence Implementation
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000548
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proposing a “PICO” for evidence implementation projects: the Problem, Implementation/Intervention, Evaluation, Context, and Engagement (PIECE) approach

Alexa McArthur, Daphne Stannard, Miloslav Klugar, Yeetey Enuameh et al.
JBI Evidence Implementation
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Proposing a “PICO” for evidence implementation projects: the Problem, Implementation/Intervention, Evaluation, Context, and Engagement (PIECE) approach

Alexa McArthur, Daphne Stannard, Miloslav Klugar, Yeetey Enuameh, Zachary Munn, Adam S. Cooper, Daniela Cardoso, Kylie Porritt, Jitka Klugarová, Bridie Kent, Lucylynn Lizardono
article en

Abstract

This article explores the development and utility of the PIECE (Practice/Problem of interest, Intervention/Implementation, Evaluation, Context, and Engagement) planning and question framework as a structured approach for planning and conducting evidence implementation projects. Traditionally, the PICO model has been used as a guiding framework for formulating clinical questions and structuring systematic reviews; however, the elements of PICO do not suit the unique requirements of evidence implementation projects in real-world settings. Each element of PIECE addresses a critical component of implementation: selecting a problem grounded in evidence, choosing effective interventions, defining evaluation metrics, assessing contextual factors, and engaging relevant stakeholders. Through examples of successful JBI implementation projects, we illustrate how PIECE can be used to conceptualize and execute implementation efforts. The proposed framework provides a structured yet flexible roadmap, allowing health care teams to initiate and sustain meaningful improvements. PIECE supports the planning phase of implementation projects, fostering better alignment with organizational goals and greater stakeholder engagement. As implementation science continues to evolve, PIECE offers a grounded approach for clinicians seeking to embed evidence into daily practice.

JBI Evidence ImplementationVol. 24(1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Moravská Vysoká Skola Olomouc (CZ), Centre for Research in Anthropology (PT), Kintampo Health Research Centre (GH), O2 Czech Republic (Czechia) (CZ), The University of Adelaide (AU), San Francisco State University (US), University of Plymouth (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.