Dynamic CO2 Emission Differences Between E10 and E85 Fuels Based on Speed–Acceleration Mapping

This study compared CO2 emissions during a WLTP (Worldwide Harmonized Light-Duty Vehicles Test Procedure) test performed on a chassis dynamometer for the same flex-fuel vehicle, fuelled sequentially with E10 gasoline and E85 fuel. Based on the test data, a CO2 emissions map was created, describing its dependence on speed and acceleration. The use of a 3D surface enabled the visualisation of the whole dynamics of emissions as a function of engine load in the WLTP cycle, including the identification of distinct emission peaks in areas of high positive acceleration. Analysis of the emission surface enabled the identification of structural differences between the fuels. For E85, more pronounced emission increases are observed in areas of intense acceleration, a consequence of the higher fuel demand resulting from the lower calorific value of bioethanol. In steady-state and moderate-load driving, CO2 emissions for both fuels are similar. The results confirm that the main differences between E10 and E85 are not simply a shift in emission levels per se, but stem from variations in engine load during the dynamic cycle. Although E85 emits measurable CO2 emissions, its carbon is not of fossil origin, highlighting the importance of biofuels in the context of greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies and the pursuit of climate neutrality. The presented methodology, combining chassis dynamometer tests with analysis of the speed-acceleration emission map, provides a tool for clearly identifying emission zones and can serve as a basis for further optimisation of engine control strategies and assessing the impact of fuel composition on emissions under dynamic conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vehicle emissions and performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic CO2 Emission Differences Between E10 and E85 Fuels Based on Speed–Acceleration Mapping

Robertas Keršys, Magdalena Zimakowska-Laskowska, J. Matijosius, Piotr Laskowski et al.
1 citations
Energies
Vehicle emissions and performance
0.68
article

Dynamic CO2 Emission Differences Between E10 and E85 Fuels Based on Speed–Acceleration Mapping

Robertas Keršys, Magdalena Zimakowska-Laskowska, J. Matijosius, Piotr Laskowski, S. Oszczak, Piotr Wiśniowski, M. K. Wojs, S. Dowkontt, Edward Kozłowski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compared CO2 emissions during a WLTP (Worldwide Harmonized Light-Duty Vehicles Test Procedure) test performed on a chassis dynamometer for the same flex-fuel vehicle, fuelled sequentially with E10 gasoline and E85 fuel. Based on the test data, a CO2 emissions map was created, describing its dependence on speed and acceleration. The use of a 3D surface enabled the visualisation of the whole dynamics of emissions as a function of engine load in the WLTP cycle, including the identification of distinct emission peaks in areas of high positive acceleration. Analysis of the emission surface enabled the identification of structural differences between the fuels. For E85, more pronounced emission increases are observed in areas of intense acceleration, a consequence of the higher fuel demand resulting from the lower calorific value of bioethanol. In steady-state and moderate-load driving, CO2 emissions for both fuels are similar. The results confirm that the main differences between E10 and E85 are not simply a shift in emission levels per se, but stem from variations in engine load during the dynamic cycle. Although E85 emits measurable CO2 emissions, its carbon is not of fossil origin, highlighting the importance of biofuels in the context of greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies and the pursuit of climate neutrality. The presented methodology, combining chassis dynamometer tests with analysis of the speed-acceleration emission map, provides a tool for clearly identifying emission zones and can serve as a basis for further optimisation of engine control strategies and assessing the impact of fuel composition on emissions under dynamic conditions.

EnergiesVol. 19(1)
Warsaw University of Technology (PL), Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (LT), Kaunas University of Technology (LT), Polish Air Force Academy (PL), Instytut Transportu Samochodowego (PL), Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Politechnika Warszawska
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Vehicle emissions and performance
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.