Source apportionment and oxidative potential of PM1 and PM2.5 in Seoul, South Korea

Particulate matter (PM), especially PM<sub>2.5</sub>, has been widely studied due to its adverse health effects, whereas PM<sub>1</sub> has been relatively understudied. This study investigated the chemical constituents, source apportionment, and oxidative potential of PM<sub>1</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> to assess the need for research and management of PM<sub>1</sub>. PM samples were collected in Seoul, South Korea, from June 2021 to March 2022 and analyzed. The dithiothreitol (DTT) assay was applied to evaluate the oxidative potential of the cold-season samples. Dispersion-normalized positive matrix factorization (DN-PMF) resolved ten sources common to both sizes: secondary nitrate, secondary sulfate, motor vehicle, biomass burning, incinerator, industry, coal combustion, soil, oil combustion, and aged sea salt. The average PM<sub>1</sub>/PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentration ratio was 0.75. Secondary nitrate showed the highest PM<sub>1</sub>/PM<sub>2.5</sub> contribution ratio (0.89), whereas industry, soil, oil combustion, and aged sea salt exhibited relatively low ratios (≤0.6). The DTT assay showed that PM<sub>1</sub> exhibited higher oxidative potential per unit mass than PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Multiple linear regression identified secondary nitrate, biomass burning, industry, coal combustion, and soil as major sources explaining oxidative potential of PM<sub>1</sub>. For PM<sub>2.5</sub>, secondary nitrate, biomass burning, incinerator, industry, and soil were important. Biomass burning showed the highest standardized coefficient in both sizes, indicating it was the major cold season contributor to oxidative potential. Continued research on PM<sub>1</sub> will provide valuable insights into source characteristics of PM and its health effect. Regarding PM<sub>1</sub> management, the overlap in major sources with PM<sub>2.5</sub> suggests that source-specific management would be effective for managing PM<sub>1</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> simultaneously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment International
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.110010
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Source apportionment and oxidative potential of PM1 and PM2.5 in Seoul, South Korea

Yeonseung Cheong, Kwonho Jeon, Jiwon Ryu, Jieun Park et al.
Environment International
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Source apportionment and oxidative potential of PM1 and PM2.5 in Seoul, South Korea

Yeonseung Cheong, Kwonho Jeon, Jiwon Ryu, Jieun Park, Taeyeon Kim, Ilhan Ryoo, Philip K. Hopke, Moonkyung Kim, Seung-Muk Yi
article en

Abstract

Particulate matter (PM), especially PM<sub>2.5</sub>, has been widely studied due to its adverse health effects, whereas PM<sub>1</sub> has been relatively understudied. This study investigated the chemical constituents, source apportionment, and oxidative potential of PM<sub>1</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> to assess the need for research and management of PM<sub>1</sub>. PM samples were collected in Seoul, South Korea, from June 2021 to March 2022 and analyzed. The dithiothreitol (DTT) assay was applied to evaluate the oxidative potential of the cold-season samples. Dispersion-normalized positive matrix factorization (DN-PMF) resolved ten sources common to both sizes: secondary nitrate, secondary sulfate, motor vehicle, biomass burning, incinerator, industry, coal combustion, soil, oil combustion, and aged sea salt. The average PM<sub>1</sub>/PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentration ratio was 0.75. Secondary nitrate showed the highest PM<sub>1</sub>/PM<sub>2.5</sub> contribution ratio (0.89), whereas industry, soil, oil combustion, and aged sea salt exhibited relatively low ratios (≤0.6). The DTT assay showed that PM<sub>1</sub> exhibited higher oxidative potential per unit mass than PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Multiple linear regression identified secondary nitrate, biomass burning, industry, coal combustion, and soil as major sources explaining oxidative potential of PM<sub>1</sub>. For PM<sub>2.5</sub>, secondary nitrate, biomass burning, incinerator, industry, and soil were important. Biomass burning showed the highest standardized coefficient in both sizes, indicating it was the major cold season contributor to oxidative potential. Continued research on PM<sub>1</sub> will provide valuable insights into source characteristics of PM and its health effect. Regarding PM<sub>1</sub> management, the overlap in major sources with PM<sub>2.5</sub> suggests that source-specific management would be effective for managing PM<sub>1</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> simultaneously.

Environment InternationalVol. 207
Seoul National University (KR), Clarkson University (US), University of Washington (US), National University College (PR), Yeungnam University (KR), National Institute of Environmental Research (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.