Do current structural engineering practices accurately reflect the seismic behavior of structures?

Usage & Licensing Notice: This work is provided for academic and informational purposes only. Any commercial, practical, industrial, or organizational use, including implementation or creation of derivative works, requires prior written permission and a separate licensing agreement with the author. In conventional structural engineering practice, seismic loads are included in design codes; however, analysis and design procedures often rely on simplified representations of earthquake effects. Complex structural responses, interaction effects, and broader ground-induced influences are rarely fully assessed. These limitations affect not only structural analyses but also design methodologies, engineering software capabilities, and educational programs. As a result, the predictive accuracy of structural behavior and the achievement of performance objectives may be compromised. This work documents existing gaps in seismic effect assessment and emphasizes the need for further research, improved evaluation methods, and greater consideration of real earthquake impacts in engineering practice and education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18014572
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do current structural engineering practices accurately reflect the seismic behavior of structures?

Afshin Kalantar Afshar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Do current structural engineering practices accurately reflect the seismic behavior of structures?

Afshin Kalantar Afshar
article en

Abstract

Usage & Licensing Notice: This work is provided for academic and informational purposes only. Any commercial, practical, industrial, or organizational use, including implementation or creation of derivative works, requires prior written permission and a separate licensing agreement with the author. In conventional structural engineering practice, seismic loads are included in design codes; however, analysis and design procedures often rely on simplified representations of earthquake effects. Complex structural responses, interaction effects, and broader ground-induced influences are rarely fully assessed. These limitations affect not only structural analyses but also design methodologies, engineering software capabilities, and educational programs. As a result, the predictive accuracy of structural behavior and the achievement of performance objectives may be compromised. This work documents existing gaps in seismic effect assessment and emphasizes the need for further research, improved evaluation methods, and greater consideration of real earthquake impacts in engineering practice and education.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Institution of Structural Engineers (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do current structural engineering practices accurately reflect the seismic behavior of structures? — Afshin Kalantar Afshar · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS