Addressing unmet needs in migraine: Real-world fremanezumab effectiveness in participants of the PEARL study with at least three prior preventive treatment failures

BackgroundThe Pan-European Real Life (PEARL) Phase 4 study evaluated real-world effectiveness and safety of fremanezumab for episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) prevention. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effectiveness of fremanezumab in participants with three or more non-migraine-specific preventive treatment failures, including onabotulinumtoxinA.MethodsBaseline daily headache diary data were compared with diary data following fremanezumab initiation. Primary endpoint: proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) during the six months after fremanezumab initiation. Secondary endpoints included mean change from baseline in MMD at Months 1-12 and health-related quality of life. Safety was assessed through adverse events.ResultsOf 451 participants, 398 with three or more previous preventive treatment failures were included in the effectiveness analyses (EM, 40.2%; CM, 59.8%). Of the 290 participants with data available, the 50% responder rate was 53.8% (EM, 67.0%; CM, 46.5%) during the six months after fremanezumab initiation. The safety profile was consistent with previous findings.ConclusionsThis post-hoc analysis supports the effectiveness and safety of fremanezumab for migraine prevention in patients with three or more prior preventive treatment failures. These findings are consistent with those from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in a similar population, illustrating the transferability of RCT data to real-world clinical practice.Trial registrationencepp.eu: EUPAS35111.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cephalalgia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251395029
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing unmet needs in migraine: Real-world fremanezumab effectiveness in participants of the PEARL study with at least three prior preventive treatment failures

Pinar Kokturk, Cristina Tassorelli, Messoud Ashina, Patricia Pozo-Rosich et al.
Cephalalgia
Migraine and Headache Studies
article

Addressing unmet needs in migraine: Real-world fremanezumab effectiveness in participants of the PEARL study with at least three prior preventive treatment failures

Pinar Kokturk, Cristina Tassorelli, Messoud Ashina, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Hasan Akcicek
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe Pan-European Real Life (PEARL) Phase 4 study evaluated real-world effectiveness and safety of fremanezumab for episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) prevention. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effectiveness of fremanezumab in participants with three or more non-migraine-specific preventive treatment failures, including onabotulinumtoxinA.MethodsBaseline daily headache diary data were compared with diary data following fremanezumab initiation. Primary endpoint: proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) during the six months after fremanezumab initiation. Secondary endpoints included mean change from baseline in MMD at Months 1-12 and health-related quality of life. Safety was assessed through adverse events.ResultsOf 451 participants, 398 with three or more previous preventive treatment failures were included in the effectiveness analyses (EM, 40.2%; CM, 59.8%). Of the 290 participants with data available, the 50% responder rate was 53.8% (EM, 67.0%; CM, 46.5%) during the six months after fremanezumab initiation. The safety profile was consistent with previous findings.ConclusionsThis post-hoc analysis supports the effectiveness and safety of fremanezumab for migraine prevention in patients with three or more prior preventive treatment failures. These findings are consistent with those from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in a similar population, illustrating the transferability of RCT data to real-world clinical practice.Trial registrationencepp.eu: EUPAS35111.

CephalalgiaVol. 45(12)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Pavia (IT), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Teva Pharmaceuticals (Netherlands) (NL)
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Migraine and Headache Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.