Benchmarking control strategies for UAV swarms: Centralized, decentralized, or federated reinforcement learning

• This work compares centralized, decentralized, and federated RL for UAV swarms. • Eight metrics assess speed, stability, scalability, and generalization. • Centralized RL converges fastest and achieves the highest final rewards. • Decentralized RL scales best but has the slowest convergence and efficiency. • Federated RL balances speed, scalability, and cross-environment transfer. Autonomous UAV swarms are becoming increasingly important in mission-critical domains where coordination depends on training approaches that enable effective cooperation among agents. This work presents an evaluation of three dominant reinforcement learning paradigms, centralized, decentralized, and federated, within the context of cooperative UAV swarm training. We develop a unified experimental approach and benchmark these strategies across standardized environments and tasks, including target search and coordinated navigation. This evaluation covers eight critical metrics, including total training time, convergence rate, sample efficiency, training stability, final reward achieved, policy generalization, transferability, and scalability. The results show that centralized learning converges fastest (1,800 ± 82 epochs) and achieves the highest final reward (26.31) with the best sample efficiency (2.46 reward/1k interactions), but suffers from poor scalability (75.7% drop in reward from 8- to 36-agent swarm) and lower transferability (64.9%). Decentralized learning generalizes better (81.0% transferability) and scales more effectively (64.3% drop) but converges slowest (2,400 ± 96 epochs) with the lowest sample efficiency (1.78). Federated learning provides a strong middle ground, combining a good convergence speed (1,950 ± 89 epochs) and high transferability (88.6%) with the best scalability (55.6% drop) while maintaining comparable final reward (25.48). These findings provide practical guidelines for selecting appropriate learning architectures in real-world swarm deployment scenarios and set the groundwork for future research on hybrid and adaptive reinforcement learning strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace Science and Technology
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.111539
Primary Topic
UAV Applications and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking control strategies for UAV swarms: Centralized, decentralized, or federated reinforcement learning

Usama Athar, Mirza Aqib Ali, Sara Sial, Adnan Maqsood
Aerospace Science and Technology
UAV Applications and Optimization
article

Benchmarking control strategies for UAV swarms: Centralized, decentralized, or federated reinforcement learning

Usama Athar, Mirza Aqib Ali, Sara Sial, Adnan Maqsood
article en

Abstract

• This work compares centralized, decentralized, and federated RL for UAV swarms. • Eight metrics assess speed, stability, scalability, and generalization. • Centralized RL converges fastest and achieves the highest final rewards. • Decentralized RL scales best but has the slowest convergence and efficiency. • Federated RL balances speed, scalability, and cross-environment transfer. Autonomous UAV swarms are becoming increasingly important in mission-critical domains where coordination depends on training approaches that enable effective cooperation among agents. This work presents an evaluation of three dominant reinforcement learning paradigms, centralized, decentralized, and federated, within the context of cooperative UAV swarm training. We develop a unified experimental approach and benchmark these strategies across standardized environments and tasks, including target search and coordinated navigation. This evaluation covers eight critical metrics, including total training time, convergence rate, sample efficiency, training stability, final reward achieved, policy generalization, transferability, and scalability. The results show that centralized learning converges fastest (1,800 ± 82 epochs) and achieves the highest final reward (26.31) with the best sample efficiency (2.46 reward/1k interactions), but suffers from poor scalability (75.7% drop in reward from 8- to 36-agent swarm) and lower transferability (64.9%). Decentralized learning generalizes better (81.0% transferability) and scales more effectively (64.3% drop) but converges slowest (2,400 ± 96 epochs) with the lowest sample efficiency (1.78). Federated learning provides a strong middle ground, combining a good convergence speed (1,950 ± 89 epochs) and high transferability (88.6%) with the best scalability (55.6% drop) while maintaining comparable final reward (25.48). These findings provide practical guidelines for selecting appropriate learning architectures in real-world swarm deployment scenarios and set the groundwork for future research on hybrid and adaptive reinforcement learning strategies.

Aerospace Science and TechnologyVol. 170
National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
UAV Applications and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.