Corruption risk and EU funding in public procurement across EU member states, 2007–2023

Abstract Aid and subsidies can support development by addressing resource gaps, improving infrastructure, and strengthening institutional capacity. However, both theoretical and empirical research also highlights the potential adverse effects of aid—particularly in weak institutional environments—where it can undermine accountability, facilitate rent-seeking and corruption, and entrench corrupt elites. A key question, therefore, is how EU subsidies correlate with levels of corruption. This paper investigates this question using public procurement contract data from EU Member States between 2007 and 2023. The analysis draws on contract-level data from the EU's Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) database, which contains over 8.2 million contracts from the 2007–2023 period. The findings reveal that, after controlling for various characteristics of public procurement contracts, EU-funded contracts are associated with higher levels of corruption risk. This result holds across both traditional corruption risk indicators, such as the proportion of non-competitive contract awards, and alternative indicators better suited to capturing the institutional context of corruption. We observe a strong positive correlation between EU subsidies and corruption risk in Western European countries as well. These findings carry important policy implications: the European Commission should enhance its monitoring of EU-funded public procurement in all Member States, including those in Western Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Oeconomica
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2025.00266
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corruption risk and EU funding in public procurement across EU member states, 2007–2023

István János Tóth, Miklós Hajdu
1 citations
Acta Oeconomica
Public Procurement and Policy
2.23
article

Corruption risk and EU funding in public procurement across EU member states, 2007–2023

István János Tóth, Miklós Hajdu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aid and subsidies can support development by addressing resource gaps, improving infrastructure, and strengthening institutional capacity. However, both theoretical and empirical research also highlights the potential adverse effects of aid—particularly in weak institutional environments—where it can undermine accountability, facilitate rent-seeking and corruption, and entrench corrupt elites. A key question, therefore, is how EU subsidies correlate with levels of corruption. This paper investigates this question using public procurement contract data from EU Member States between 2007 and 2023. The analysis draws on contract-level data from the EU's Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) database, which contains over 8.2 million contracts from the 2007–2023 period. The findings reveal that, after controlling for various characteristics of public procurement contracts, EU-funded contracts are associated with higher levels of corruption risk. This result holds across both traditional corruption risk indicators, such as the proportion of non-competitive contract awards, and alternative indicators better suited to capturing the institutional context of corruption. We observe a strong positive correlation between EU subsidies and corruption risk in Western European countries as well. These findings carry important policy implications: the European Commission should enhance its monitoring of EU-funded public procurement in all Member States, including those in Western Europe.

Acta OeconomicaVol. 75(4)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), SGH Warsaw School of Economics (PL), ELTE Centre for Economic and Regional Studies (HU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Public Procurement and Policy
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.