Screening for Mental Distress Following the 2022 Marche Floods in Italy: A Comparative Study Using the Kessler Distress Scale in Directly Affected Individuals and a Control Group

ABSTRACT In recent years, extreme rainfall events led to severe flooding in several European countries which caused extraordinary human and economic losses. Such events, which are projected to become more likely because of climate change, expose many citizens to extremely stressful situations that involve intense fear, shock, and loss. Previous studies clearly point toward a direct relation between such flood experiences and negative mental health outcomes of those affected. However, existing studies commonly focus on directly exposed populations only, preventing a direct comparison with a control group. This makes it more difficult to separate the effect of the flood event from other factors that potentially affect the mental health of the respondents. Here, we use survey data from 698 residents from the Marche region in Italy, which was affected by disastrous flooding in 2022. The survey focused not only on the directly affected population ( n = 392) but also included a nonaffected control group ( n = 306). We use the short version of the Kessler Distress Scale (K6) as a screener for severe mental distress. Results show that directly affected respondents exhibit a 13.1%–16.7% higher prevalence rate of indications of severe mental distress compared to the control group. The significant impact of the flood event on negative mental health outcomes is further confirmed by regression analyses, which show a direct influence of several flood stressors on severe mental distress, including physical health impacts and higher water levels on one's own building. Since mental illness is associated with high burdens for those affected and their families, as well as high socioeconomic costs, this aspect deserves more attention in postdisaster contexts. The results presented in this article can be used as a reference by responsible authorities for estimating the additional demand for psychological assistance needed in the aftermath of such severe events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70167
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Screening for Mental Distress Following the 2022 Marche Floods in Italy: A Comparative Study Using the Kessler Distress Scale in Directly Affected Individuals and a Control Group

Philip Bubeck, Daniela Molinari, Sara Rrokaj
2 citations
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
4.61
article

Screening for Mental Distress Following the 2022 Marche Floods in Italy: A Comparative Study Using the Kessler Distress Scale in Directly Affected Individuals and a Control Group

Philip Bubeck, Daniela Molinari, Sara Rrokaj
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent years, extreme rainfall events led to severe flooding in several European countries which caused extraordinary human and economic losses. Such events, which are projected to become more likely because of climate change, expose many citizens to extremely stressful situations that involve intense fear, shock, and loss. Previous studies clearly point toward a direct relation between such flood experiences and negative mental health outcomes of those affected. However, existing studies commonly focus on directly exposed populations only, preventing a direct comparison with a control group. This makes it more difficult to separate the effect of the flood event from other factors that potentially affect the mental health of the respondents. Here, we use survey data from 698 residents from the Marche region in Italy, which was affected by disastrous flooding in 2022. The survey focused not only on the directly affected population ( n = 392) but also included a nonaffected control group ( n = 306). We use the short version of the Kessler Distress Scale (K6) as a screener for severe mental distress. Results show that directly affected respondents exhibit a 13.1%–16.7% higher prevalence rate of indications of severe mental distress compared to the control group. The significant impact of the flood event on negative mental health outcomes is further confirmed by regression analyses, which show a direct influence of several flood stressors on severe mental distress, including physical health impacts and higher water levels on one's own building. Since mental illness is associated with high burdens for those affected and their families, as well as high socioeconomic costs, this aspect deserves more attention in postdisaster contexts. The results presented in this article can be used as a reference by responsible authorities for estimating the additional demand for psychological assistance needed in the aftermath of such severe events.

Journal of Flood Risk ManagementVol. 18(4)
University of Potsdam (DE), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
European Commission
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.