Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Macroscopic Vascular Invasion: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighted Analysis

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macrovascular invasion (MVI) varies between systemic immunotherapy and locoregional approaches. We compared atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) with locoregional therapy in treatment-naïve patients. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with image- or biopsy-proven HCC and MVI, Child-Pugh A/B, and ECOG 0-1 who received first-line Atezo-Bev or locoregional therapy (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] with or without external-beam radiotherapy [RT]). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) minimized baseline imbalances. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Modified RECIST assessed radiologic response, and major adverse events were classified using Society of Interventional Radiology criteria. <b>Results</b>: We analyzed 475 patients (Atezo-Bev, <i>n</i> = 191; locoregional therapy, <i>n</i> = 284). Baseline characteristics were similar, and IPTW achieved covariate balance. Median OS was 9.3 months with Atezo-Bev and 10.8 months with locoregional therapy; after IPTW, OS remained comparable (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95; 95% CI 0.76-1.19; <i>p</i> = 0.635). Median PFS was 6.0 versus 4.1 months, favoring Atezo-Bev; this persisted after IPTW (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.79; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Objective response rates were similar (45% vs. 48%; <i>p</i> = 0.49). Major adverse events occurred in 11% of patients in both groups. Subgroup analyses showed no OS differences and a consistent PFS advantage with Atezo-Bev. <b>Conclusions</b>: In HCC with MVI, first-line Atezo-Bev achieved longer PFS than locoregional therapy, with comparable OS and safety, supporting Atezo-Bev as a valid and effective first-line option for disease control while locoregional modalities remain relevant within multidisciplinary care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010033
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Macroscopic Vascular Invasion: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighted Analysis

Gun Ha Kim, Sang Min Yoon, Sehee Kim, J. H. Shin et al.
Cancers
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Macroscopic Vascular Invasion: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighted Analysis

Gun Ha Kim, Sang Min Yoon, Sehee Kim, J. H. Shin, Dong Il Gwon, Hee Ho Chu, Byung Soo Im, Ju Hyun Shim, Jin-Hyoung Kim, Jihoon Kim
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macrovascular invasion (MVI) varies between systemic immunotherapy and locoregional approaches. We compared atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) with locoregional therapy in treatment-naïve patients. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with image- or biopsy-proven HCC and MVI, Child-Pugh A/B, and ECOG 0-1 who received first-line Atezo-Bev or locoregional therapy (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] with or without external-beam radiotherapy [RT]). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) minimized baseline imbalances. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Modified RECIST assessed radiologic response, and major adverse events were classified using Society of Interventional Radiology criteria. <b>Results</b>: We analyzed 475 patients (Atezo-Bev, <i>n</i> = 191; locoregional therapy, <i>n</i> = 284). Baseline characteristics were similar, and IPTW achieved covariate balance. Median OS was 9.3 months with Atezo-Bev and 10.8 months with locoregional therapy; after IPTW, OS remained comparable (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95; 95% CI 0.76-1.19; <i>p</i> = 0.635). Median PFS was 6.0 versus 4.1 months, favoring Atezo-Bev; this persisted after IPTW (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.79; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Objective response rates were similar (45% vs. 48%; <i>p</i> = 0.49). Major adverse events occurred in 11% of patients in both groups. Subgroup analyses showed no OS differences and a consistent PFS advantage with Atezo-Bev. <b>Conclusions</b>: In HCC with MVI, first-line Atezo-Bev achieved longer PFS than locoregional therapy, with comparable OS and safety, supporting Atezo-Bev as a valid and effective first-line option for disease control while locoregional modalities remain relevant within multidisciplinary care.

CancersVol. 18(1)
Ulsan College (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.