Effect of Sample Hemolysis on D-dimer Test Results in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism – A Retrospective Study

CONTEXT: Hemolysis within blood samples can impact the accuracy of D-dimer values, potentially affecting the diagnostic threshold for ruling out pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the influence of sample hemolysis on D-dimer measurements and its consequential impact on patient management, particularly concerning the general and age-adapted diagnostic rule-out thresholds. SETTINGS AND DESIGNS: Retrospective evaluation of D-dimer values was conducted in patients presenting with suspected PE, determined by the Wells score. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The effect of a maximal bias of 3.4% was assumed as worst-case scenario, a shift from a D-D above the general (≥0.5 mg/L) or the age-adapted rule (age × 10, if age >50 years) defined as clinically relevant due to its potential to miss a PE due to overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography in older patient. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Semi-autonomous were analyzed using the %2-test and continuous ones using the Mann–Whitney U -test. RESULTS: Out of 293 patients (53.9% were men, and the average age was 64 ± 17 years old), 63.1% of patients had verified PE. Hemolysis appeared in 19.1% of samples, mainly mild/moderate. The 3.4% bias correction reduced one D-dimer value to below the age-adapted cutoff and one below the general one without any involvement of hemolysis in either. CONCLUSIONS: There is minimal clinical effect of hemolysis on the D-dimension rule-out of PE and rare effects of threshold shifting. Interpretation of D-dimer results is very important to prevent errors in diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Hematology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/joah.joah_75_25
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Sample Hemolysis on D-dimer Test Results in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism – A Retrospective Study

E. Giannitsis, Safaa H. Abudawoud, Vitali Koch, Nobert Frey et al.
Journal of Applied Hematology
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Effect of Sample Hemolysis on D-dimer Test Results in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism – A Retrospective Study

E. Giannitsis, Safaa H. Abudawoud, Vitali Koch, Nobert Frey, Hugo A. Katus
article en

Abstract

CONTEXT: Hemolysis within blood samples can impact the accuracy of D-dimer values, potentially affecting the diagnostic threshold for ruling out pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the influence of sample hemolysis on D-dimer measurements and its consequential impact on patient management, particularly concerning the general and age-adapted diagnostic rule-out thresholds. SETTINGS AND DESIGNS: Retrospective evaluation of D-dimer values was conducted in patients presenting with suspected PE, determined by the Wells score. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The effect of a maximal bias of 3.4% was assumed as worst-case scenario, a shift from a D-D above the general (≥0.5 mg/L) or the age-adapted rule (age × 10, if age >50 years) defined as clinically relevant due to its potential to miss a PE due to overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography in older patient. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Semi-autonomous were analyzed using the %2-test and continuous ones using the Mann–Whitney U -test. RESULTS: Out of 293 patients (53.9% were men, and the average age was 64 ± 17 years old), 63.1% of patients had verified PE. Hemolysis appeared in 19.1% of samples, mainly mild/moderate. The 3.4% bias correction reduced one D-dimer value to below the age-adapted cutoff and one below the general one without any involvement of hemolysis in either. CONCLUSIONS: There is minimal clinical effect of hemolysis on the D-dimension rule-out of PE and rare effects of threshold shifting. Interpretation of D-dimer results is very important to prevent errors in diagnosis.

Journal of Applied HematologyVol. 16(4)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of Sample Hemolysis on D-dimer Test Results in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism – A Retrospective Study — E. Giannitsis, Safaa H. Abudawoud, et al. · Journal of Applied Hematology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS