App-supported instruction and motor skill development in early grade children

Purpose This study aims to analyse the effects of app-assisted instruction on the development and assessment of fundamental motor skills in early elementary school children. Specifically, it investigates whether the integration of digital tools, alongside traditional teaching methods, influences the motor performance outcomes measured by the Test of Gross Motor Development - 3, as well as the reliability of assessments conducted with technological support. Methods A total of 62 children (mean age = 8.03 ± 1.38 years) were assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development – 3, comparing traditional and app-assisted instructional methods. Results The analysis of Test of Gross Motor Development – 3 scores showed similar mean performances between traditional and app-assisted methods; however, the reliability ranged from poor to fair, particularly affecting locomotor and ball skills. Tasks such as running, galloping, and hopping showed low consistency ( between 0.068 and 0.216), while lateral running presented the highest reliability among locomotor skills (α = 0.345). In ball skills, only bouncing and underhand throwing reached fair reliability (α = 0.28). These findings suggest that while app-assisted instruction may enhance engagement, it can influence task execution and scoring consistency, reinforcing the need for evaluator supervision and proper training when incorporating digital tools. While most skill means were similar between methods, lateral run (app: <i>M</i> = 7.27, <i>SD</i> = 1.40 vs. trad: <i>M</i> = 6.79, <i>SD</i> = 2.11) demonstrated higher consistency (α = 0.345). Among ball skills, underhand throwing showed better agreement (α = 0.284), suggesting certain tasks benefit more from standardised visual instruction. No statistical corrections for multiple comparisons were applied given the exploratory nature of the analysis. Conclusions It is concluded that technology can complement, but not replace, traditional motor assessment methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Movement
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/hm/211593
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

App-supported instruction and motor skill development in early grade children

Glauber Carvalho Nobre, Marcelo Gonçalves Duarte, Isadora Almeida da Motta, Hevini Quidá Sorio et al.
Human Movement
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

App-supported instruction and motor skill development in early grade children

Glauber Carvalho Nobre, Marcelo Gonçalves Duarte, Isadora Almeida da Motta, Hevini Quidá Sorio, Mary Grazielly Ferreira Cardoso
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyse the effects of app-assisted instruction on the development and assessment of fundamental motor skills in early elementary school children. Specifically, it investigates whether the integration of digital tools, alongside traditional teaching methods, influences the motor performance outcomes measured by the Test of Gross Motor Development - 3, as well as the reliability of assessments conducted with technological support. Methods A total of 62 children (mean age = 8.03 ± 1.38 years) were assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development – 3, comparing traditional and app-assisted instructional methods. Results The analysis of Test of Gross Motor Development – 3 scores showed similar mean performances between traditional and app-assisted methods; however, the reliability ranged from poor to fair, particularly affecting locomotor and ball skills. Tasks such as running, galloping, and hopping showed low consistency ( between 0.068 and 0.216), while lateral running presented the highest reliability among locomotor skills (α = 0.345). In ball skills, only bouncing and underhand throwing reached fair reliability (α = 0.28). These findings suggest that while app-assisted instruction may enhance engagement, it can influence task execution and scoring consistency, reinforcing the need for evaluator supervision and proper training when incorporating digital tools. While most skill means were similar between methods, lateral run (app: <i>M</i> = 7.27, <i>SD</i> = 1.40 vs. trad: <i>M</i> = 6.79, <i>SD</i> = 2.11) demonstrated higher consistency (α = 0.345). Among ball skills, underhand throwing showed better agreement (α = 0.284), suggesting certain tasks benefit more from standardised visual instruction. No statistical corrections for multiple comparisons were applied given the exploratory nature of the analysis. Conclusions It is concluded that technology can complement, but not replace, traditional motor assessment methods.

Human MovementVol. 26(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

App-supported instruction and motor skill development in early grade children — Glauber Carvalho Nobre, Marcelo Gonçalves Duarte, et al. · Human Movement (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS