Confidence Intervals for Two Proportions—A Generalized Estimation and Information Assessment

This paper develops profile score confidence intervals (i.e., z-standard intervals) by inverting orthogonalized score estimators for comparing two independent binomial proportions in rate difference, rate ratio, or odds ratio and utilizes a generalized estimation framework of Vos and Wu (Inf. Geom. 8: 99–123, 2025) to evaluate different confidence interval methods. The orthogonalized score estimators dominate other generalized estimators in Λ-efficiency for distinguishing parameter values around the truth, so the z-standard intervals become more efficient and acquire coverage closer to the nominal level than other types of confidence intervals. In addition, the degrees of freedom and small-sample corrections (applied to the profile nuisance parameter estimates) are expected to improve the coverage of the z-standard intervals and help maintain them above the nominal level. Computational algorithms are developed to find the z-standard intervals using R’s polyroot function. Numerical studies are conducted to compare both coverage and endpoints of different types of confidence intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14010045
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confidence Intervals for Two Proportions—A Generalized Estimation and Information Assessment

Paul Vos, Qiang Wu
Mathematics
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Confidence Intervals for Two Proportions—A Generalized Estimation and Information Assessment

Paul Vos, Qiang Wu
article en

Abstract

This paper develops profile score confidence intervals (i.e., z-standard intervals) by inverting orthogonalized score estimators for comparing two independent binomial proportions in rate difference, rate ratio, or odds ratio and utilizes a generalized estimation framework of Vos and Wu (Inf. Geom. 8: 99–123, 2025) to evaluate different confidence interval methods. The orthogonalized score estimators dominate other generalized estimators in Λ-efficiency for distinguishing parameter values around the truth, so the z-standard intervals become more efficient and acquire coverage closer to the nominal level than other types of confidence intervals. In addition, the degrees of freedom and small-sample corrections (applied to the profile nuisance parameter estimates) are expected to improve the coverage of the z-standard intervals and help maintain them above the nominal level. Computational algorithms are developed to find the z-standard intervals using R’s polyroot function. Numerical studies are conducted to compare both coverage and endpoints of different types of confidence intervals.

MathematicsVol. 14(1)
East Carolina University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.