An LLM–MCDM Framework with Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Recommendation Systems: A Case Study in Food Preference

Food recommender systems are pivotal in helping people make optimal dietary choices based on tremendous amounts of data. Extant studies offer different methods and techniques, but the combination of similarity search, large language models (LLMs), and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) remains underexplored. This study proposes a new system that leverages all three. First, we utilize an LLM to suggest queries from the same domain as the dish database. Then, the queries are vectorized and used for similarity search to generate a preliminary list of suggested menu items. Next, multiple LLMs provide scores for each item, which become the MCDM inputs, where Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) enhances the weighted sum scalarization technique. We evaluated the prototype on three publicly available dish datasets and at classification thresholds of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75, and the proposed domain-adaptation approach consistently outperformed the baseline query. For example, at the 0.50 threshold, precision ranged from 49.11% to 56.60%, compared with 35.40% for the baseline. Furthermore, aggregating multiple LLMs mitigates single-model bias in recommendations. To substantiate this, a bootstrap evaluation of the proposed LCCC-based consensus weighting confirms that both the estimated weights and the induced rankings are numerically stable under sampling perturbations. To further ensure the robustness and reliability of the proposed system, we validate the results against other established weighting schemes and state-of-the-art MCDM methods. Moreover, Kendall’s τ-based comparisons across weighting schemes and multiple MCDM methods confirm that the proposed LCCC-based framework produces highly consistent and statistically significant rankings, demonstrating strong robustness to methodological choices. This paper contributes a system architecture and design that can be adopted for other domains of recommender systems where the capability of multiple LLMs can benefit complex and multifaceted decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010117
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An LLM–MCDM Framework with Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Recommendation Systems: A Case Study in Food Preference

Thanathorn Phoka, Pornpimon Boriwan, Thanwa Wathahong
Applied Sciences
Recommender Systems and Techniques
article

An LLM–MCDM Framework with Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Recommendation Systems: A Case Study in Food Preference

Thanathorn Phoka, Pornpimon Boriwan, Thanwa Wathahong
article en

Abstract

Food recommender systems are pivotal in helping people make optimal dietary choices based on tremendous amounts of data. Extant studies offer different methods and techniques, but the combination of similarity search, large language models (LLMs), and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) remains underexplored. This study proposes a new system that leverages all three. First, we utilize an LLM to suggest queries from the same domain as the dish database. Then, the queries are vectorized and used for similarity search to generate a preliminary list of suggested menu items. Next, multiple LLMs provide scores for each item, which become the MCDM inputs, where Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) enhances the weighted sum scalarization technique. We evaluated the prototype on three publicly available dish datasets and at classification thresholds of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75, and the proposed domain-adaptation approach consistently outperformed the baseline query. For example, at the 0.50 threshold, precision ranged from 49.11% to 56.60%, compared with 35.40% for the baseline. Furthermore, aggregating multiple LLMs mitigates single-model bias in recommendations. To substantiate this, a bootstrap evaluation of the proposed LCCC-based consensus weighting confirms that both the estimated weights and the induced rankings are numerically stable under sampling perturbations. To further ensure the robustness and reliability of the proposed system, we validate the results against other established weighting schemes and state-of-the-art MCDM methods. Moreover, Kendall’s τ-based comparisons across weighting schemes and multiple MCDM methods confirm that the proposed LCCC-based framework produces highly consistent and statistically significant rankings, demonstrating strong robustness to methodological choices. This paper contributes a system architecture and design that can be adopted for other domains of recommender systems where the capability of multiple LLMs can benefit complex and multifaceted decision-making processes.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(1)
Chulalongkorn University (TH), Khon Kaen University (TH), Naresuan University (TH)
Naresuan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.