Comparing Patient Demographics in Insertional Achilles Tendinitis Repair With vs Without Graft

Research Type: Level 3 - Retrospective cohort study, Case-control study, Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies Introduction/Purpose: Insertional Achilles tendon injuries present unique challenges in orthopedic and sports medicine. Surgical repair options include direct tendon repair or reconstruction using a graft, each with its own set of benefits and risks. Although this condition typically affects an older population, we are seeing a decrease in the age of this population with recreational sports becoming popular thus inducing further injuries and stress. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patient demographics that receive a repair with graft for insertional Achilles tendinitis (IAT). Methods: This was a retrospective multi-surgeon single institution cohort study reviewing the demographics of patients who had a surgical repair for IAT. Demographics, medical history, surgical details, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. We excluded patients with a BMI over 30. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Visual Analog Scale (FAAM-VAS) score. Results: 753 patients were identified (557 without vs 196 with graft). Individuals receiving a graft were older (45.5 vs 40.0 years, p< 0.001). They also had a higher BMI (26.8 vs. 26.0, p=0.010) and CCI (0.82 vs. 0.42, p< 0.001). The reinforcement group had a higher proportion of females (24.0% vs. 16.7%, p=0.035) and experienced significantly longer time to surgery (58.8 vs. 21.4 days, p< 0.001). Preoperative physical therapy and steroid injections were more common in the reinforcement group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in revision, readmission, or the need for additional treatments. Postoperative function, measured by the Delta FAAM VAS score, showed greater improvement in the non-reinforcement group (-18.30 vs. -1.39, p=0.033). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that age, sex, BMI, CCI, and exhaustion of conservative treatments influence a surgeon’s decision when implementing a graft in an IAT repair.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011425s00180
Primary Topic
Tendon Structure and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Patient Demographics in Insertional Achilles Tendinitis Repair With vs Without Graft

Selene G. Parekh, DO Joseph N. Daniel, David I. Pedowitz, Kush S. Mody et al.
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Tendon Structure and Treatment
article

Comparing Patient Demographics in Insertional Achilles Tendinitis Repair With vs Without Graft

Selene G. Parekh, DO Joseph N. Daniel, David I. Pedowitz, Kush S. Mody, Joydeep Baidya, Amy Nghe, Omar Sarhan, Nana Amponsah, Grant Thomas, Tyler West, Nathan Rose
article en

Abstract

Research Type: Level 3 - Retrospective cohort study, Case-control study, Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies Introduction/Purpose: Insertional Achilles tendon injuries present unique challenges in orthopedic and sports medicine. Surgical repair options include direct tendon repair or reconstruction using a graft, each with its own set of benefits and risks. Although this condition typically affects an older population, we are seeing a decrease in the age of this population with recreational sports becoming popular thus inducing further injuries and stress. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patient demographics that receive a repair with graft for insertional Achilles tendinitis (IAT). Methods: This was a retrospective multi-surgeon single institution cohort study reviewing the demographics of patients who had a surgical repair for IAT. Demographics, medical history, surgical details, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. We excluded patients with a BMI over 30. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Visual Analog Scale (FAAM-VAS) score. Results: 753 patients were identified (557 without vs 196 with graft). Individuals receiving a graft were older (45.5 vs 40.0 years, p< 0.001). They also had a higher BMI (26.8 vs. 26.0, p=0.010) and CCI (0.82 vs. 0.42, p< 0.001). The reinforcement group had a higher proportion of females (24.0% vs. 16.7%, p=0.035) and experienced significantly longer time to surgery (58.8 vs. 21.4 days, p< 0.001). Preoperative physical therapy and steroid injections were more common in the reinforcement group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in revision, readmission, or the need for additional treatments. Postoperative function, measured by the Delta FAAM VAS score, showed greater improvement in the non-reinforcement group (-18.30 vs. -1.39, p=0.033). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that age, sex, BMI, CCI, and exhaustion of conservative treatments influence a surgeon’s decision when implementing a graft in an IAT repair.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 10(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Tendon Structure and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.