Golden eye — How traders focus on and select information in experimental asset markets

In this study, we examine the subjective importance that traders attribute to specific information elements in experimental asset markets in two ways. First, using eye-tracking technology, we determine which given elements garner the most visual focus among traders. Second, we let traders actively choose a limited set of the given elements to determine which ones they deem important to have while trading. Our results indicate that the order book is the most important to traders, while the price chart is of low importance. There is only a conditional alignment between the elements that receive the most visual focus and those that traders select. Additionally, cognitive abilities play a non-trivial role in determining which information elements traders focus on. Finally, we find mixed evidence of a potential link between visual focus and trading performance. • We examine the importance traders attribute to information elements in experimental markets. • Using eye-tracking technology, we study which elements garner traders’ attention. • Additionally, we let traders actively choose a limited set of the given elements. • The order book gets most attention, while the price chart is of low importance. • The elements receiving the most attention partly overlap with traders’ selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2025.101138
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Golden eye — How traders focus on and select information in experimental asset markets

Simon Liegl, Martin Angerer, Matthias Herrmann-Romero, Thomas Stöckl
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Golden eye — How traders focus on and select information in experimental asset markets

Simon Liegl, Martin Angerer, Matthias Herrmann-Romero, Thomas Stöckl
article en

Abstract

In this study, we examine the subjective importance that traders attribute to specific information elements in experimental asset markets in two ways. First, using eye-tracking technology, we determine which given elements garner the most visual focus among traders. Second, we let traders actively choose a limited set of the given elements to determine which ones they deem important to have while trading. Our results indicate that the order book is the most important to traders, while the price chart is of low importance. There is only a conditional alignment between the elements that receive the most visual focus and those that traders select. Additionally, cognitive abilities play a non-trivial role in determining which information elements traders focus on. Finally, we find mixed evidence of a potential link between visual focus and trading performance. • We examine the importance traders attribute to information elements in experimental markets. • Using eye-tracking technology, we study which elements garner traders’ attention. • Additionally, we let traders actively choose a limited set of the given elements. • The order book gets most attention, while the price chart is of low importance. • The elements receiving the most attention partly overlap with traders’ selection.

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental FinanceVol. 49
University of Liechtenstein (LI), Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of St.Gallen (CH), Management Center Innsbruck (AT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.