Environmental, Social and Governance ( <scp>ESG</scp> ) Rating Divergence and Corporate Carbon Risk: Evidence From China

ABSTRACT This study investigates the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating divergence on corporate carbon risk (CR) using a sample of Chinese A‐share listed companies from 2011 to 2020. As confirmed by a series of robustness checks, ESG rating divergence significantly exacerbates corporate CR. Moderating mechanism analysis reveals that increased corporate environmental attention and enhanced information transparency mitigate this adverse effect. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of ESG rating divergence on CR is more pronounced in firms with focused operations, higher emissions, low‐quality audits, and limited political connections. Additional analysis indicates that corporate CR tends to rise with greater rating divergence among industry peers. This study offers recommendations for regulating ESG ratings, guiding enterprises to mitigate CR, and helping investors better account for rating divergence in their decision‐making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70125
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental, Social and Governance ( ESG ) Rating Divergence and Corporate Carbon Risk: Evidence From China

Qunyong Jiang, Fang Wang
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Environmental, Social and Governance ( ESG ) Rating Divergence and Corporate Carbon Risk: Evidence From China

Qunyong Jiang, Fang Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating divergence on corporate carbon risk (CR) using a sample of Chinese A‐share listed companies from 2011 to 2020. As confirmed by a series of robustness checks, ESG rating divergence significantly exacerbates corporate CR. Moderating mechanism analysis reveals that increased corporate environmental attention and enhanced information transparency mitigate this adverse effect. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of ESG rating divergence on CR is more pronounced in firms with focused operations, higher emissions, low‐quality audits, and limited political connections. Additional analysis indicates that corporate CR tends to rise with greater rating divergence among industry peers. This study offers recommendations for regulating ESG ratings, guiding enterprises to mitigate CR, and helping investors better account for rating divergence in their decision‐making.

International Journal of Finance & Economics
Hainan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Environmental, Social and Governance ( <scp>ESG</scp> ) Rating Divergence and Corporate Carbon Risk: Evidence From China — Qunyong Jiang, Fang Wang · International Journal of Finance & Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS