Rabies Infections in Animals and People in Russia: A Comparative Historical Analysis

A comparative historical analysis of the role of mammals in infecting animals and people with rabies in Russia from 1534 to 2023 is conducted. Before the early 19th century, people were infected by only four species: dogs, wolves, foxes, and horses. All farm and domestic animals were susceptible to the disease. From 1825 to 1942, rabies in foxes ceased to be registered in the country (with a few exceptions). In 1951–2023, active antiepidemic work reduced the number of people infected by 23 times. The number of infected animals decreased only 2.2 times. This was explained by the existence of natural foci of rabies. The foci were studied in 1966–2023. The natural infection rate of different species of mammals obtained in field expeditions and collected from hunters was determined (n = 24 582 individuals). The average infection rate varied from 0.07% in rodents to 10.1% in arctic foxes. In foxes it was 0.2–5.4%, raccoon dogs 4.5%, corsac foxes 2.5%, wolves 1.1%, and mustelids 0.55%. The rabies infection rate in rodents (0.07%), bats (0.4%), lagomorphs (0.5%), and insectivores (0.1%) was very low and was explained by accidental infection, overdiagnosis, or laboratory contamination. All cases of rabies in land mammals were caused by the Lyssavirus rabies pathogen. This pathogen was not detected in bats, but the following pathogens were identified: Lyssavirus hamburg, Lyssavirus irkut, and Lyssavirus caucasicus, which were not recorded in dogs, cats, foxes, wolves, or other land animals. The first two viruses were known to cause death in people. The rates of rabies registration in wild animals depended on their behavior. In 2023, veterinarians registered about 40% of wild foxes infected with the disease and 1–2% of wolves, raccoon dogs, and corsac foxes. The last two species, participating in the circulation of the virus in nature and in its transmission to dogs, cats, and farm animals, unlike rabid foxes, usually died without coming into the field of view of people. Bites of humans by rabid wolves were 28–36 times more dangerous than dog bites.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Biology Bulletin Reviews
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079086425600754
Primary Topic
Rabies epidemiology and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rabies Infections in Animals and People in Russia: A Comparative Historical Analysis

E. M. Poleshchuk, E. S. Savkina, G. N. Sidorov
Biology Bulletin Reviews
Rabies epidemiology and control
article

Rabies Infections in Animals and People in Russia: A Comparative Historical Analysis

E. M. Poleshchuk, E. S. Savkina, G. N. Sidorov
article en

Abstract

A comparative historical analysis of the role of mammals in infecting animals and people with rabies in Russia from 1534 to 2023 is conducted. Before the early 19th century, people were infected by only four species: dogs, wolves, foxes, and horses. All farm and domestic animals were susceptible to the disease. From 1825 to 1942, rabies in foxes ceased to be registered in the country (with a few exceptions). In 1951–2023, active antiepidemic work reduced the number of people infected by 23 times. The number of infected animals decreased only 2.2 times. This was explained by the existence of natural foci of rabies. The foci were studied in 1966–2023. The natural infection rate of different species of mammals obtained in field expeditions and collected from hunters was determined (n = 24 582 individuals). The average infection rate varied from 0.07% in rodents to 10.1% in arctic foxes. In foxes it was 0.2–5.4%, raccoon dogs 4.5%, corsac foxes 2.5%, wolves 1.1%, and mustelids 0.55%. The rabies infection rate in rodents (0.07%), bats (0.4%), lagomorphs (0.5%), and insectivores (0.1%) was very low and was explained by accidental infection, overdiagnosis, or laboratory contamination. All cases of rabies in land mammals were caused by the Lyssavirus rabies pathogen. This pathogen was not detected in bats, but the following pathogens were identified: Lyssavirus hamburg, Lyssavirus irkut, and Lyssavirus caucasicus, which were not recorded in dogs, cats, foxes, wolves, or other land animals. The first two viruses were known to cause death in people. The rates of rabies registration in wild animals depended on their behavior. In 2023, veterinarians registered about 40% of wild foxes infected with the disease and 1–2% of wolves, raccoon dogs, and corsac foxes. The last two species, participating in the circulation of the virus in nature and in its transmission to dogs, cats, and farm animals, unlike rabid foxes, usually died without coming into the field of view of people. Bites of humans by rabid wolves were 28–36 times more dangerous than dog bites.

Biology Bulletin ReviewsVol. 15(S3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Rabies epidemiology and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.