Explainable machine learning for preoperative relapse prediction in molecularly stratified endometrial cancer: A single-center finnish cohort study

Relapse risk in endometrial carcinoma (EC) is driven by molecular subtype, yet current WHO/ESGO classifications rely on postoperative data, limiting their preoperative use. We developed interpretable machine learning (ML) models to predict relapse timing (none, ≤6 months, >6 months) using exclusively preoperative multimodal data. In a single-center retrospective cohort of 784 EC patients, clinicopathological, molecular, immunohistochemical, and systemic biomarkers were integrated using four feature strategies: Traditional (clinicopathology), ESGO-based (guideline risk groups),TP53 + MMRd (high-risk biology), and POLE (low-risk). Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, Gradient Boosting (GBM) models were trained with leakage-safe preprocessing and evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, and F1 score, with interpretability assessed by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The RF-Traditional model achieved the best overall performance (F1 = 0.895, AUC = 0.840), while the GBM-POLE model achieved the highest sensitivity (F1 = 0.886, AUC = 0.842). However, prediction of Late Relapse remained challenging (F1 = 0.31) due to class rarity and heterogeneity. Key predictors included ARID1A loss, elevated CA125, thrombocytosis, and p16 expression among key predictors of relapse; while shared high-risk features across models were advanced stage, deep myometrial invasion, elevated CA125, and positive cytology. While multi-center validation is essential, our findings support biologically coherent predictions for individualized preoperative risk stratification, particularly for high-risk molecular subtypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2025.12.018
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable machine learning for preoperative relapse prediction in molecularly stratified endometrial cancer: A single-center finnish cohort study

Masuma Khatun, Vijayachitra Modhukur, Ralf Bützow, Mikko Loukovaara et al.
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Explainable machine learning for preoperative relapse prediction in molecularly stratified endometrial cancer: A single-center finnish cohort study

Masuma Khatun, Vijayachitra Modhukur, Ralf Bützow, Mikko Loukovaara, Andres Salumets, Annukka Pasanen, Sergio Vela Moreno
article en

Abstract

Relapse risk in endometrial carcinoma (EC) is driven by molecular subtype, yet current WHO/ESGO classifications rely on postoperative data, limiting their preoperative use. We developed interpretable machine learning (ML) models to predict relapse timing (none, ≤6 months, >6 months) using exclusively preoperative multimodal data. In a single-center retrospective cohort of 784 EC patients, clinicopathological, molecular, immunohistochemical, and systemic biomarkers were integrated using four feature strategies: Traditional (clinicopathology), ESGO-based (guideline risk groups),TP53 + MMRd (high-risk biology), and POLE (low-risk). Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, Gradient Boosting (GBM) models were trained with leakage-safe preprocessing and evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, and F1 score, with interpretability assessed by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The RF-Traditional model achieved the best overall performance (F1 = 0.895, AUC = 0.840), while the GBM-POLE model achieved the highest sensitivity (F1 = 0.886, AUC = 0.842). However, prediction of Late Relapse remained challenging (F1 = 0.31) due to class rarity and heterogeneity. Key predictors included ARID1A loss, elevated CA125, thrombocytosis, and p16 expression among key predictors of relapse; while shared high-risk features across models were advanced stage, deep myometrial invasion, elevated CA125, and positive cytology. While multi-center validation is essential, our findings support biologically coherent predictions for individualized preoperative risk stratification, particularly for high-risk molecular subtypes.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalVol. 31
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), University of Helsinki (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Competence Centre on Health Technologies (Estonia) (EE), University of Tartu (EE)
Eesti Teadusagentuur, Suomen Kulttuurirahasto, K. Albin Johanssons Stiftelse, Syöpäsäätiö, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.