CFD analysis and parameter optimization of explosion suppression powder injection in a bag filter

The accumulation of combustible dust in industrial bag filters poses severe explosion risks. Automatic suppressant powder injection serves as a key protective measure, whose effectiveness hinges critically on the injection flow field and the uniformity of suppressant dispersion. This study employs a transient gas-solid two-phase CFD model in ANSYS Fluent to investigate an industrial bag filter. Based on the Euler-Lagrange framework and the Discrete Phase Model (DPM), flow field characteristics and suppressant dispersion patterns were systematically analyzed under three injection directions (downwind, upwind, sideward) and two pressures (4 MPa and 5 MPa). The coefficient of variation (COV) was introduced to quantify distribution uniformity. Results indicate that the downwind injection at 5 MPa achieves an optimal balance between coverage and stability, yielding a bottom average dust concentration of 0.85 kg/m 3 and a COV of 0.33. The sideward injection at 4 MPa offers better flow stability (COV = 0.42) albeit with slightly lower coverage. In contrast, the upwind 5 MPa condition is the least favorable, as intense vortices induce suppressant re-suspension. These findings provide a theoretical basis and direct parametric guidance for the explosion-proof design and optimization of bag filter systems. • CFD analysis reveals the coupled effects of injection direction and pressure on explosion suppression flow fields. • Downwind injection at 5 MPa provides optimal coverage and stability, while upwind injection causes powder re-suspension. • The coefficient of variation is introduced to quantitatively evaluate the uniformity of powder dispersion. • Hopper bottom flow activity is identified as a key indicator of explosion suppression effectiveness. • Engineering guidelines are proposed for optimizing explosion protection in industrial bag filters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105895
Primary Topic
Combustion and Detonation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CFD analysis and parameter optimization of explosion suppression powder injection in a bag filter

MENG Xiangbao, Yuan Jun, Liu Shanshan, Li Dengzhao
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
Combustion and Detonation Processes
article

CFD analysis and parameter optimization of explosion suppression powder injection in a bag filter

MENG Xiangbao, Yuan Jun, Liu Shanshan, Li Dengzhao
article en

Abstract

The accumulation of combustible dust in industrial bag filters poses severe explosion risks. Automatic suppressant powder injection serves as a key protective measure, whose effectiveness hinges critically on the injection flow field and the uniformity of suppressant dispersion. This study employs a transient gas-solid two-phase CFD model in ANSYS Fluent to investigate an industrial bag filter. Based on the Euler-Lagrange framework and the Discrete Phase Model (DPM), flow field characteristics and suppressant dispersion patterns were systematically analyzed under three injection directions (downwind, upwind, sideward) and two pressures (4 MPa and 5 MPa). The coefficient of variation (COV) was introduced to quantify distribution uniformity. Results indicate that the downwind injection at 5 MPa achieves an optimal balance between coverage and stability, yielding a bottom average dust concentration of 0.85 kg/m 3 and a COV of 0.33. The sideward injection at 4 MPa offers better flow stability (COV = 0.42) albeit with slightly lower coverage. In contrast, the upwind 5 MPa condition is the least favorable, as intense vortices induce suppressant re-suspension. These findings provide a theoretical basis and direct parametric guidance for the explosion-proof design and optimization of bag filter systems. • CFD analysis reveals the coupled effects of injection direction and pressure on explosion suppression flow fields. • Downwind injection at 5 MPa provides optimal coverage and stability, while upwind injection causes powder re-suspension. • The coefficient of variation is introduced to quantitatively evaluate the uniformity of powder dispersion. • Hopper bottom flow activity is identified as a key indicator of explosion suppression effectiveness. • Engineering guidelines are proposed for optimizing explosion protection in industrial bag filters.

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process IndustriesVol. 100
Qingdao Academy of Intelligent Industries (CN), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Combustion and Detonation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.