Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Subanalysis of Japanese Patients From <scp>CheckMate 77T</scp>

In the randomized phase III CheckMate 77T study, perioperative nivolumab showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in event-free survival (EFS) vs. placebo in patients with resectable, non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report efficacy and safety outcomes in the Japanese subpopulation. Adults with resectable stage IIA-IIIB NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus placebo every 3 weeks for ≤ 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab or placebo every 4 weeks for ≤ 13 cycles. Assessments included EFS (primary endpoint), pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and safety. A total of 68 Japanese patients were randomized to perioperative nivolumab (n = 40) or placebo (n = 28). At 24.9 months' median follow-up, median EFS was not reached (NR; 95% CI: 21.4-NR) with perioperative nivolumab vs. 12.1 (95% CI: 8.1-NR) months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI: 0.22-0.95]); 18-month EFS rates were 76.6% vs. 42.9%, respectively. The pCR rate (95% CI) was 42.5% (27.0%-59.1%) with perioperative nivolumab vs. 0% (0%-12.3%) with placebo (odds ratio [OR], not available); MPR rate (95% CI) was 52.5% (36.1%-68.5%) vs. 7.1% (0.9%-23.5%), respectively (OR, 14.37; 95% CI: 3.00-68.82). Grade 3-4 treatment-related and surgery-related adverse events with perioperative nivolumab vs. placebo occurred in 55.0% vs. 39.3% and 16.7% vs. 19.2% of patients. Consistent with the global population, perioperative nivolumab improved EFS, pCR, and MPR vs. placebo in the Japanese subpopulation, with no new safety signals reported, supporting its use in Japanese patients with resectable NSCLC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04025879.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Science
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70300
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Subanalysis of Japanese Patients From CheckMate 77T

S. Meadows–Shropshire, M. Okada, HIDEHITO HORINOUCHI, J. Okami et al.
Cancer Science
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Subanalysis of Japanese Patients From CheckMate 77T

S. Meadows–Shropshire, M. Okada, HIDEHITO HORINOUCHI, J. Okami, Yoshitsugu Horio, Padma Sathyanarayana, Masahiro Tsuboi, Masahiro Seike, Kazuya Takamochi, K. Okishio, Cinthya Coronado Erdmann, Yasutaka Watanabe, Shunichi Sugawara, Hiroyuki Ito, Yuichi Tambo, Fumihiro Tanaka, Satoshi Muto, Yuki Sato
article en

Abstract

In the randomized phase III CheckMate 77T study, perioperative nivolumab showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in event-free survival (EFS) vs. placebo in patients with resectable, non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report efficacy and safety outcomes in the Japanese subpopulation. Adults with resectable stage IIA-IIIB NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus placebo every 3 weeks for ≤ 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab or placebo every 4 weeks for ≤ 13 cycles. Assessments included EFS (primary endpoint), pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and safety. A total of 68 Japanese patients were randomized to perioperative nivolumab (n = 40) or placebo (n = 28). At 24.9 months' median follow-up, median EFS was not reached (NR; 95% CI: 21.4-NR) with perioperative nivolumab vs. 12.1 (95% CI: 8.1-NR) months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI: 0.22-0.95]); 18-month EFS rates were 76.6% vs. 42.9%, respectively. The pCR rate (95% CI) was 42.5% (27.0%-59.1%) with perioperative nivolumab vs. 0% (0%-12.3%) with placebo (odds ratio [OR], not available); MPR rate (95% CI) was 52.5% (36.1%-68.5%) vs. 7.1% (0.9%-23.5%), respectively (OR, 14.37; 95% CI: 3.00-68.82). Grade 3-4 treatment-related and surgery-related adverse events with perioperative nivolumab vs. placebo occurred in 55.0% vs. 39.3% and 16.7% vs. 19.2% of patients. Consistent with the global population, perioperative nivolumab improved EFS, pCR, and MPR vs. placebo in the Japanese subpopulation, with no new safety signals reported, supporting its use in Japanese patients with resectable NSCLC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04025879.

Cancer ScienceVol. 117(3)
Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization (JP), Juntendo University (JP), Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US), Fukuoka University Hospital (JP), Kanazawa University Hospital (JP), Saitama Cancer Center (JP), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP), Aichi Cancer Center (JP), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Fukushima Medical University Hospital (JP), Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP), Nippon Medical School Hospital (JP), NHO Kinki Chuo Chest Medical Center (JP), Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital (JP), Sendai Kousei Hospital (JP)
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.