Percentage of Gutta-Percha-Filled Areas in Canals Obturated by Two Different Core Techniques with Endodontic Bioceramics Sealer

The aim of this preliminary study was to compare two core-carrier obturation techniques-GuttaFusion (GF) and SoftCore (SC)-used in combination with a bioceramic sealer (NeoSealer Flo), and to evaluate their ability to fill simulated root canals. Eight standardized resin models of maxillary first molars were used, and only the P and DV canals of each model were obturated. Cross-sections were obtained at 1 mm and 3 mm from the apex, and the percentage areas occupied by gutta-percha (PGFA), sealer (PSFA), and voids (VA) were measured. This study provides novel comparative data on the performance of these two carrier-based techniques when used with a bioceramic sealer. GF showed higher PGFA and lower PSFA compared with SC at 1 mm from the apex, while SC presented slightly higher VA. At 3 mm, PGFA increased for both techniques. Descriptive statistics (means and percentage values) were calculated; no inferential statistical analysis was performed due to the preliminary nature of the study and the limited sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19010037
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Percentage of Gutta-Percha-Filled Areas in Canals Obturated by Two Different Core Techniques with Endodontic Bioceramics Sealer

Antonio Libonati, Vincenzo Campanella, Giulia Campanella, Giulio Barbalace et al.
Materials
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Percentage of Gutta-Percha-Filled Areas in Canals Obturated by Two Different Core Techniques with Endodontic Bioceramics Sealer

Antonio Libonati, Vincenzo Campanella, Giulia Campanella, Giulio Barbalace, Danilo Marroni
article en

Abstract

The aim of this preliminary study was to compare two core-carrier obturation techniques-GuttaFusion (GF) and SoftCore (SC)-used in combination with a bioceramic sealer (NeoSealer Flo), and to evaluate their ability to fill simulated root canals. Eight standardized resin models of maxillary first molars were used, and only the P and DV canals of each model were obturated. Cross-sections were obtained at 1 mm and 3 mm from the apex, and the percentage areas occupied by gutta-percha (PGFA), sealer (PSFA), and voids (VA) were measured. This study provides novel comparative data on the performance of these two carrier-based techniques when used with a bioceramic sealer. GF showed higher PGFA and lower PSFA compared with SC at 1 mm from the apex, while SC presented slightly higher VA. At 3 mm, PGFA increased for both techniques. Descriptive statistics (means and percentage values) were calculated; no inferential statistical analysis was performed due to the preliminary nature of the study and the limited sample.

MaterialsVol. 19(1)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel (AL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Percentage of Gutta-Percha-Filled Areas in Canals Obturated by Two Different Core Techniques with Endodontic Bioceramics Sealer — Antonio Libonati, Vincenzo Campanella, et al. · Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS