Northern Hemisphere Midlatitude Cyclone Intensity Biases in Machine Learning Weather Prediction Models

Abstract Forecasting the location and intensity of strong winds associated with midlatitude cyclones is important as they can have significant safety, economic, and environmental impacts. In this study, we use a feature-based evaluation method to assess the performance of both numerical weather prediction and machine learning weather prediction (MLWP) models in forecasting midlatitude cyclone winds. By tracking over 1000 cyclones across the Northern Hemisphere from 1 October 2023 to 31 March 2024 in seven MLWP models, we systematically compare model performance. Our results show that MLWP models predict midlatitude cyclone tracks with accuracy comparable to the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) forecast out to 10 days. However, MLWP models exhibit a persistent intensity bias, underestimating cyclone minimum sea level pressure by more than 5 hPa at 10-day forecast lead times, whereas the ECMWF IFS forecast has no bias. Additionally, all MLWP models produce weaker than observed peak 10-m winds, even at short lead times. In contrast, the ECMWF IFS forecast exhibits no bias in 10-m wind speed. These differences highlight the limitations of current MLWP models in capturing important high-impact weather features like peak wind speeds. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Machine learning weather prediction models predict midlatitude cyclone tracks comparably to numerical weather prediction models but underestimate cyclone intensity, particularly minimum surface pressure and peak wind speeds, highlighting areas where machine learning models need improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-25-0129.1
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Northern Hemisphere Midlatitude Cyclone Intensity Biases in Machine Learning Weather Prediction Models

Simon Driscoll, Ben Harvey, Ambrogio Volonté, N. J. Harvey et al.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
article

Northern Hemisphere Midlatitude Cyclone Intensity Biases in Machine Learning Weather Prediction Models

Simon Driscoll, Ben Harvey, Ambrogio Volonté, N. J. Harvey, K. M. R. Hunt, H. F. Dacre, S. L. Gray, K. I. Hodges, A. J. Charlton-Perez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Forecasting the location and intensity of strong winds associated with midlatitude cyclones is important as they can have significant safety, economic, and environmental impacts. In this study, we use a feature-based evaluation method to assess the performance of both numerical weather prediction and machine learning weather prediction (MLWP) models in forecasting midlatitude cyclone winds. By tracking over 1000 cyclones across the Northern Hemisphere from 1 October 2023 to 31 March 2024 in seven MLWP models, we systematically compare model performance. Our results show that MLWP models predict midlatitude cyclone tracks with accuracy comparable to the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) forecast out to 10 days. However, MLWP models exhibit a persistent intensity bias, underestimating cyclone minimum sea level pressure by more than 5 hPa at 10-day forecast lead times, whereas the ECMWF IFS forecast has no bias. Additionally, all MLWP models produce weaker than observed peak 10-m winds, even at short lead times. In contrast, the ECMWF IFS forecast exhibits no bias in 10-m wind speed. These differences highlight the limitations of current MLWP models in capturing important high-impact weather features like peak wind speeds. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Machine learning weather prediction models predict midlatitude cyclone tracks comparably to numerical weather prediction models but underestimate cyclone intensity, particularly minimum surface pressure and peak wind speeds, highlighting areas where machine learning models need improvement.

Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyVol. 107(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), National Centre for Atmospheric Science (GB), National Centre for Earth Observation (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.