An Investigation of Surgical Feeding Access in Patients With Remote Bariatric Surgery History

BackgroundPatients with a history of bariatric surgery present a challenge in obtaining surgical feeding access due to altered gastrointestinal anatomy after these procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate provider practice patterns for feeding tube access in bariatric patients.MethodsPatients with a history of either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy who required surgical feeding access remote from their bariatric surgery were identified retrospectively at a single institution. Data on the nature of these procedures and their associated complications were obtained. A literature review was conducted on tube placement procedures after bariatric and foregut surgery and 11 publications were included.ResultsGastrostomy tubes (GTs) (n = 26/42, 61.9%) were placed most frequently, followed by jejunostomy tubes (JTs) (n = 13/42, 31.0%), and gastrojejunostomy tubes (n = 3/42, 7.1%). Most feeding tubes were placed in patients with a history of a RYGB (n = 29/38, 76.3%). General surgeons performed most of these procedures (n = 37/42, 88.1%). Feeding tube-associated complications were reported in most cases (n = 22/42, 52.4%). Two patients receiving JTs after sleeve gastrectomy developed aspiration pneumonia (n = 2/42, 4.8%).DiscussionThis study highlights the need for further research on surgical feeding access in patients with a history of bariatric surgery. Larger, prospective studies may help to define guidelines for feeding tube access in bariatric patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251409255
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Investigation of Surgical Feeding Access in Patients With Remote Bariatric Surgery History

Corbin Lemon, Ann Smith, Renee Rumsey, Michael Cook
The American Surgeon
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

An Investigation of Surgical Feeding Access in Patients With Remote Bariatric Surgery History

Corbin Lemon, Ann Smith, Renee Rumsey, Michael Cook
article en

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with a history of bariatric surgery present a challenge in obtaining surgical feeding access due to altered gastrointestinal anatomy after these procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate provider practice patterns for feeding tube access in bariatric patients.MethodsPatients with a history of either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy who required surgical feeding access remote from their bariatric surgery were identified retrospectively at a single institution. Data on the nature of these procedures and their associated complications were obtained. A literature review was conducted on tube placement procedures after bariatric and foregut surgery and 11 publications were included.ResultsGastrostomy tubes (GTs) (n = 26/42, 61.9%) were placed most frequently, followed by jejunostomy tubes (JTs) (n = 13/42, 31.0%), and gastrojejunostomy tubes (n = 3/42, 7.1%). Most feeding tubes were placed in patients with a history of a RYGB (n = 29/38, 76.3%). General surgeons performed most of these procedures (n = 37/42, 88.1%). Feeding tube-associated complications were reported in most cases (n = 22/42, 52.4%). Two patients receiving JTs after sleeve gastrectomy developed aspiration pneumonia (n = 2/42, 4.8%).DiscussionThis study highlights the need for further research on surgical feeding access in patients with a history of bariatric surgery. Larger, prospective studies may help to define guidelines for feeding tube access in bariatric patients.

The American Surgeon
University Medical Center New Orleans (US), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.