The value of routine endoscopic ultrasound in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Active surveillance for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) involves repeated diagnostic tests to detect cancer regrowth. In the SANO trial, this included esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsies, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of suspicious lymph nodes, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT). The value of routine EUS in this setting remains largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of EUS over PET-CT.A retrospective analysis of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent nCRT followed by clinical response evaluations with EGD, EUS, and PET-CT was performed. Initial response assessment was performed within 3 months post-nCRT. Patients without tumor regrowth underwent active surveillance with repeated diagnostic testing. The primary outcome was the rate of EUS-detected lymph node metastases missed by PET-CT, after excluding cases with positive EGD findings or distant metastases.327 patients underwent both PET-CT and EUS post-nCRT, accounting for 1006 combined procedures: 327 at initial response assessment; 679 during active surveillance (6-60 months post-nCRT) in 121 patients. Positive lymph nodes were detected by EUS in 3.7% (12/327) of initial response assessments, with 2.1% (7/327) unidentified by PET-CT. During surveillance, this dropped to 0.9% of assessments (6/679), with 0.1% (1/679) missed by PET-CT.EUS with FNA adds most value at 3 months post-nCRT, when the likelihood of detecting recurrence is highest. Beyond 3 months, its added value is limited (0.1% with negative PET-CT). Restricting the use of EUS to PET-suspicious nodes could omit 98% of EUS procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2776-5896
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The value of routine endoscopic ultrasound in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Vincent T. Janmaat, Matteo Pittacolo, Lieke Hol, Bianca Mostert et al.
Endoscopy
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

The value of routine endoscopic ultrasound in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Vincent T. Janmaat, Matteo Pittacolo, Lieke Hol, Bianca Mostert, Erik J. Schoon, Eva Kouw, Tanya M. Bisseling, Rutger Quispel, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Erik Vegt, A. Van der Linden, B.P.L. Wijnhoven, Sietske Corporaal, Jurjen J. Boonstra, Jolanda M van Dieren, L E Oostenbrug, Judith Honing, J Jan B van Lanschot, W L Hazen, Sanjiv S G Gangaram Panday, on behalf of the SANO Study Group*
article en

Abstract

Active surveillance for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) involves repeated diagnostic tests to detect cancer regrowth. In the SANO trial, this included esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsies, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of suspicious lymph nodes, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT). The value of routine EUS in this setting remains largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of EUS over PET-CT.A retrospective analysis of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent nCRT followed by clinical response evaluations with EGD, EUS, and PET-CT was performed. Initial response assessment was performed within 3 months post-nCRT. Patients without tumor regrowth underwent active surveillance with repeated diagnostic testing. The primary outcome was the rate of EUS-detected lymph node metastases missed by PET-CT, after excluding cases with positive EGD findings or distant metastases.327 patients underwent both PET-CT and EUS post-nCRT, accounting for 1006 combined procedures: 327 at initial response assessment; 679 during active surveillance (6-60 months post-nCRT) in 121 patients. Positive lymph nodes were detected by EUS in 3.7% (12/327) of initial response assessments, with 2.1% (7/327) unidentified by PET-CT. During surveillance, this dropped to 0.9% of assessments (6/679), with 0.1% (1/679) missed by PET-CT.EUS with FNA adds most value at 3 months post-nCRT, when the likelihood of detecting recurrence is highest. Beyond 3 months, its added value is limited (0.1% with negative PET-CT). Restricting the use of EUS to PET-suspicious nodes could omit 98% of EUS procedures.

Endoscopy
University of Padua (IT), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Gelre Hospitals (NL), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), Reinier de Graaf Hospital (NL), Maasstad Ziekenhuis (NL), Zuyderland Medisch Centrum (NL), Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL), Ziekenhuis Groep Twente (NL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
Sanofi, ZonMw
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.