Divergent roles of visual structure and conceptual meaning in scene detection and categorization

Human observers can recognize the meaning of a complex visual scene in a fraction of a second, but not all scenes are equally easy to recognize at a glance. What governs this variability? We tested the hypothesis that scene understanding is modulated by two distinct forms of information: visual information, defined as the structural complexity of the image, and semantic information, defined as the richness of the conceptual content of the scene. We quantified visual information using image compressibility and quantified semantic information from the complexity of human-written scene descriptions. Across four behavioral experiments, participants performed either a rapid detection task (distinguishing intact scenes from phase-scrambled masks) or a basic-level categorization task. High visual information impaired both detection and categorization, consistent with a perceptual bottleneck. In contrast, high-semantic information facilitated detection but not categorization, suggesting that conceptual richness facilitates early perceptual processes without necessarily improving recognition. These findings reveal a dissociation between visual and semantic scene attributes and suggest that top-down expectations can selectively support early perceptual processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.14.21
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divergent roles of visual structure and conceptual meaning in scene detection and categorization

Michelle R. Greene, Sage Aronson, Maria S. Adkins
Journal of Vision
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Divergent roles of visual structure and conceptual meaning in scene detection and categorization

Michelle R. Greene, Sage Aronson, Maria S. Adkins
article en

Abstract

Human observers can recognize the meaning of a complex visual scene in a fraction of a second, but not all scenes are equally easy to recognize at a glance. What governs this variability? We tested the hypothesis that scene understanding is modulated by two distinct forms of information: visual information, defined as the structural complexity of the image, and semantic information, defined as the richness of the conceptual content of the scene. We quantified visual information using image compressibility and quantified semantic information from the complexity of human-written scene descriptions. Across four behavioral experiments, participants performed either a rapid detection task (distinguishing intact scenes from phase-scrambled masks) or a basic-level categorization task. High visual information impaired both detection and categorization, consistent with a perceptual bottleneck. In contrast, high-semantic information facilitated detection but not categorization, suggesting that conceptual richness facilitates early perceptual processes without necessarily improving recognition. These findings reveal a dissociation between visual and semantic scene attributes and suggest that top-down expectations can selectively support early perceptual processing.

Journal of VisionVol. 25(14)
Columbia University (US), Barnard College (US)
National Science Foundation, Barnard College
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.