Mapping Ethical Blind Spots in the Use of New Technologies to Support Elder Care

This paper maps the ethical concerns involved in using new technologies in the care of older persons by type of participant group and technology used. The study presents data from sixty-seven participants in total from three stakeholder groups (older persons, professional caregivers, and family caregivers) who relayed their opinions on three types of technologies: wearables, ambient sensors, and social assistive robots. The interview data collected was analysed using content analysis. Participants raised ethical concerns about user control, stigma, over-reliance on technology, isolation, deception, privacy breaches, and the replacement of human care. However, these concerns were not uniformly emphasized across participant groups, and not all concerns applied to each of the three technologies. Our findings revealed a reduced ethical sensitivity and preparedness for risk in the case of certain technologies. These ethical blind spots evident in our results pertained to privacy, stigma, and deception. With technologies continuously developing, such blind spots are a cause for concern.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10502-y
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Ethical Blind Spots in the Use of New Technologies to Support Elder Care

Emilian Mihailov, Lester Darryl Geneviève, Tenzin Wangmo, Yi Jiao Angelina Tian
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

Mapping Ethical Blind Spots in the Use of New Technologies to Support Elder Care

Emilian Mihailov, Lester Darryl Geneviève, Tenzin Wangmo, Yi Jiao Angelina Tian
article en

Abstract

This paper maps the ethical concerns involved in using new technologies in the care of older persons by type of participant group and technology used. The study presents data from sixty-seven participants in total from three stakeholder groups (older persons, professional caregivers, and family caregivers) who relayed their opinions on three types of technologies: wearables, ambient sensors, and social assistive robots. The interview data collected was analysed using content analysis. Participants raised ethical concerns about user control, stigma, over-reliance on technology, isolation, deception, privacy breaches, and the replacement of human care. However, these concerns were not uniformly emphasized across participant groups, and not all concerns applied to each of the three technologies. Our findings revealed a reduced ethical sensitivity and preparedness for risk in the case of certain technologies. These ethical blind spots evident in our results pertained to privacy, stigma, and deception. With technologies continuously developing, such blind spots are a cause for concern.

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
University of Bucharest (RO), University of Basel (CH), Université Laval (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.