Debunking competition - Global ecologically unequal exchange explained by exploitation and control relations

According to mainstream economic theory, competition is the fundamental force that regulates production and exchange in the global economy. It is presumed that countries compete in international markets with mutually beneficial outcomes for all parties. However, this assumption is challenged by increasing socioeconomic inequalities across and within countries, as well as global environmental degradation. Among other critical theories, Ecologically Unequal Exchange argues that international trade triggers asymmetries in the distribution of benefits and costs between Core and Periphery regions of the global economic system. We combined Environmentally Extended Multi-Regional Input-Output analysis and Ecological Network analysis to empirically determine which type of ecological relation (competition, control, exploitation or mutualism) characterizes the interaction between countries in international trade. Our research revealed that exploitation and control relations are far more prevalent than competition or mutualism in the global economy. Although the Periphery and Semi-periphery exhibit higher environmental intensities, the responsibility for most environmental degradation can be attributed to a few Core countries that drive resources' extraction and appropriation. Consequently, the Core enhances its economic and environmental performance by exploiting and controlling the Semi-periphery and Periphery. Our findings demonstrate that green growth and dematerialization policies may be unable to achieve socially fair and environmentally sustainable societies at the global level if the structure of the global economy remains unchanged. • Models the global economy as a closed system in biophysical terms. • Reveals the geographies of ecological pressures from production to consumption. • Unveils how exploitation and control overshadow competition in global trade dynamics. • Demonstrates the lack of mutualism and synergy within the global trade system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108909
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Debunking competition - Global ecologically unequal exchange explained by exploitation and control relations

Enrique Muñoz‐Ulecia, Raffaele Guarino, Giulio Corsi
1 citations
Ecological Economics
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
article

Debunking competition - Global ecologically unequal exchange explained by exploitation and control relations

Enrique Muñoz‐Ulecia, Raffaele Guarino, Giulio Corsi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

According to mainstream economic theory, competition is the fundamental force that regulates production and exchange in the global economy. It is presumed that countries compete in international markets with mutually beneficial outcomes for all parties. However, this assumption is challenged by increasing socioeconomic inequalities across and within countries, as well as global environmental degradation. Among other critical theories, Ecologically Unequal Exchange argues that international trade triggers asymmetries in the distribution of benefits and costs between Core and Periphery regions of the global economic system. We combined Environmentally Extended Multi-Regional Input-Output analysis and Ecological Network analysis to empirically determine which type of ecological relation (competition, control, exploitation or mutualism) characterizes the interaction between countries in international trade. Our research revealed that exploitation and control relations are far more prevalent than competition or mutualism in the global economy. Although the Periphery and Semi-periphery exhibit higher environmental intensities, the responsibility for most environmental degradation can be attributed to a few Core countries that drive resources' extraction and appropriation. Consequently, the Core enhances its economic and environmental performance by exploiting and controlling the Semi-periphery and Periphery. Our findings demonstrate that green growth and dematerialization policies may be unable to achieve socially fair and environmentally sustainable societies at the global level if the structure of the global economy remains unchanged. • Models the global economy as a closed system in biophysical terms. • Reveals the geographies of ecological pressures from production to consumption. • Unveils how exploitation and control overshadow competition in global trade dynamics. • Demonstrates the lack of mutualism and synergy within the global trade system.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 242
Parthenope University of Naples (IT), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), AGroecologies, Innovations & Ruralities (FR), Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.