Aeromechanics Investigation of a Full-Wing Lift-Compounded Slowed Rotor

An aeromechanical analysis of a scaled rotor with lift compounding is conducted to understand the impact of various wing configurations on performance and loads. An assessment of the half-retreating side wing and full-wing configurations is conducted for advance ratios up to 0.7, for two wing incidence angles (4° and 8°), and three rotor shaft angles (−4°, 0°, and 4°). Aircraft performance, blade pitch control angles, blade structural loads, hub vibratory loads, and aerodynamic interactions between the rotor and wing are evaluated using the University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code (UMARC). Additionally, UMARC coupled rotor-wing analysis is validated with the wind tunnel data of lift and thrust-compounded rotor configurations. The study shows that the half, asymmetric, wing configuration is beneficial for peak vehicle performance (lift-to-drag ratio) due to rotor lift offset, though the full-wing configuration minimizes blade structural loads. Maximizing wing lift sharing minimizes hub vibratory loads.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Helicopter Society
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.71.012007
Primary Topic
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aeromechanics Investigation of a Full-Wing Lift-Compounded Slowed Rotor

Inderjit Chopra, Mrinalgouda Patil, Vivek Uppoor
Journal of the American Helicopter Society
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
article

Aeromechanics Investigation of a Full-Wing Lift-Compounded Slowed Rotor

Inderjit Chopra, Mrinalgouda Patil, Vivek Uppoor
article en

Abstract

An aeromechanical analysis of a scaled rotor with lift compounding is conducted to understand the impact of various wing configurations on performance and loads. An assessment of the half-retreating side wing and full-wing configurations is conducted for advance ratios up to 0.7, for two wing incidence angles (4° and 8°), and three rotor shaft angles (−4°, 0°, and 4°). Aircraft performance, blade pitch control angles, blade structural loads, hub vibratory loads, and aerodynamic interactions between the rotor and wing are evaluated using the University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code (UMARC). Additionally, UMARC coupled rotor-wing analysis is validated with the wind tunnel data of lift and thrust-compounded rotor configurations. The study shows that the half, asymmetric, wing configuration is beneficial for peak vehicle performance (lift-to-drag ratio) due to rotor lift offset, though the full-wing configuration minimizes blade structural loads. Maximizing wing lift sharing minimizes hub vibratory loads.

Journal of the American Helicopter SocietyVol. 71(1)
Advanced Rotorcraft Technology (United States) (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.