Small Single-Stranded DNA Structure Prediction

Small single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) under 100 bases, including antisense oligonucleotides and aptamers, have been widely explored as promising therapeutics. Their three-dimensional (3D) structures are essential for guiding the development and enhancing clinical applications. However, experimentally determining these structures is often costly and time-consuming, resulting in only a few small ssDNAs with known 3D structures. Consequently, there is a pressing need for accurate computational methods to predict ssDNA structures. In this work, we examine two current strategies for ssDNA structure prediction: a traditional multistep approach and the AlphaFold 3 (AF3) approach. We evaluate these strategies using a dataset of 149 ssDNAs without ligands, representing six distinct structural motifs. Our findings indicate that AF3 is often more efficient and accurate than the traditional method, achieving a success rate (GDT = 1) of 38% (57 out of 149). Nevertheless, AF3 encounters difficulties with longer sequences or complex motifs such as G-quadruplexes and junctions. Notably, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can substantially enhance the AF3-generated structures. These insights shed light on the latest ssDNA prediction techniques and offer a practical guide for sampling ssDNA structures using AF3 and MD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02949
Primary Topic
DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Small Single-Stranded DNA Structure Prediction

Yutong Shi, Yu Shi, Jianing Li
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
article

Small Single-Stranded DNA Structure Prediction

Yutong Shi, Yu Shi, Jianing Li
article en

Abstract

Small single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) under 100 bases, including antisense oligonucleotides and aptamers, have been widely explored as promising therapeutics. Their three-dimensional (3D) structures are essential for guiding the development and enhancing clinical applications. However, experimentally determining these structures is often costly and time-consuming, resulting in only a few small ssDNAs with known 3D structures. Consequently, there is a pressing need for accurate computational methods to predict ssDNA structures. In this work, we examine two current strategies for ssDNA structure prediction: a traditional multistep approach and the AlphaFold 3 (AF3) approach. We evaluate these strategies using a dataset of 149 ssDNAs without ligands, representing six distinct structural motifs. Our findings indicate that AF3 is often more efficient and accurate than the traditional method, achieving a success rate (GDT = 1) of 38% (57 out of 149). Nevertheless, AF3 encounters difficulties with longer sequences or complex motifs such as G-quadruplexes and junctions. Notably, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can substantially enhance the AF3-generated structures. These insights shed light on the latest ssDNA prediction techniques and offer a practical guide for sampling ssDNA structures using AF3 and MD.

Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingVol. 66(1)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.