‘Nobody told George Orwell to hurry up’: Student views on the evolution of GCSE assessment

Assessments for the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) are typically taken at the end of compulsory secondary education. They are considered high-stakes examinations because access to further education and employment is often dependent on performance at GCSE. Despite this significance, GCSE students have historically not been given opportunity to share their views on assessments. This UK-based research reports findings from part of a survey that explored the changes students would wish to make to the assessment of GCSE English, Mathematics, and Science. Areas of focus were informed by the researcher’s preliminary research involving a focus group with GCSE students. Three-hundred-and-fifty-one Year 11 students completed an online survey. Open-ended questions were analysed using content analysis. Descriptive statistical analyses were completed on Likert-scale item data. Participants indicated different changes for GCSE English, Mathematics, and Science. The most prevalent desired change was for GCSE English examinations to be open book. The largest proportion of respondents indicated for Mathematics to stay as it is. For GCSE Science, the most prevalent responses were for several ‘smaller’ exams throughout the year and a combination of assessment types (e.g. exams with coursework and ‘controlled assessments’). Frequency and length of survey responses demonstrates students’ motivation to contribute to this area. Grounded in the student experience, this study offers valuable insights that contribute to broader discussions across schools, examination boards, and educational policy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology of Education Review
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2025.49.2.30
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Nobody told George Orwell to hurry up’: Student views on the evolution of GCSE assessment

Tee McCaldin, Aletia Daly, Kevin Woods
Psychology of Education Review
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

‘Nobody told George Orwell to hurry up’: Student views on the evolution of GCSE assessment

Tee McCaldin, Aletia Daly, Kevin Woods
article en

Abstract

Assessments for the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) are typically taken at the end of compulsory secondary education. They are considered high-stakes examinations because access to further education and employment is often dependent on performance at GCSE. Despite this significance, GCSE students have historically not been given opportunity to share their views on assessments. This UK-based research reports findings from part of a survey that explored the changes students would wish to make to the assessment of GCSE English, Mathematics, and Science. Areas of focus were informed by the researcher’s preliminary research involving a focus group with GCSE students. Three-hundred-and-fifty-one Year 11 students completed an online survey. Open-ended questions were analysed using content analysis. Descriptive statistical analyses were completed on Likert-scale item data. Participants indicated different changes for GCSE English, Mathematics, and Science. The most prevalent desired change was for GCSE English examinations to be open book. The largest proportion of respondents indicated for Mathematics to stay as it is. For GCSE Science, the most prevalent responses were for several ‘smaller’ exams throughout the year and a combination of assessment types (e.g. exams with coursework and ‘controlled assessments’). Frequency and length of survey responses demonstrates students’ motivation to contribute to this area. Grounded in the student experience, this study offers valuable insights that contribute to broader discussions across schools, examination boards, and educational policy.

Psychology of Education ReviewVol. 49(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.