Oral health disparities between LGB and non-LGB individuals in the United States

This study examines potential oral health disparities among both heterosexual and sexual minority adults while also investigating sex-based differences in the association between sexual orientation and poor oral health. Pooled data (2007-2016) were used from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for men and women aged 18-59. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the association between sexual orientation and self-reported oral health. Data from 20,298 participants were included in this analysis. Compared with non-LGB individuals, LGB individuals had higher odds of reporting poor oral health overall in both the unadjusted (OR = 1.20 95% CI = 1.04-1.38) and adjusted (OR= 1.21 95% CI 1.04-1.40) analyses. After stratifying by sex and adjusting for covariates, LGB women had 38% increased odds of having poor oral health compared with their non-LGB counterparts (OR= 1.38 95% CI 1.14-1.67). Sexual orientation was not associated with poor oral health in males, with adjusted odds close to null comparing LBG men with their non-LGB counterparts (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.74 - 1.29). The findings in this study indicate more work is needed to improve oral health in the LGB community, an often underserved population, and advances health equity promotion. Findings can inform oral health prevention and reduce health disparities among LGB populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medicine Surgery and Public Health
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100223
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral health disparities between LGB and non-LGB individuals in the United States

R. Andrew Yockey
Journal of Medicine Surgery and Public Health
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Oral health disparities between LGB and non-LGB individuals in the United States

R. Andrew Yockey
article en

Abstract

This study examines potential oral health disparities among both heterosexual and sexual minority adults while also investigating sex-based differences in the association between sexual orientation and poor oral health. Pooled data (2007-2016) were used from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for men and women aged 18-59. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the association between sexual orientation and self-reported oral health. Data from 20,298 participants were included in this analysis. Compared with non-LGB individuals, LGB individuals had higher odds of reporting poor oral health overall in both the unadjusted (OR = 1.20 95% CI = 1.04-1.38) and adjusted (OR= 1.21 95% CI 1.04-1.40) analyses. After stratifying by sex and adjusting for covariates, LGB women had 38% increased odds of having poor oral health compared with their non-LGB counterparts (OR= 1.38 95% CI 1.14-1.67). Sexual orientation was not associated with poor oral health in males, with adjusted odds close to null comparing LBG men with their non-LGB counterparts (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.74 - 1.29). The findings in this study indicate more work is needed to improve oral health in the LGB community, an often underserved population, and advances health equity promotion. Findings can inform oral health prevention and reduce health disparities among LGB populations.

Journal of Medicine Surgery and Public HealthVol. 8
University of Mississippi (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.