N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) Methylation-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation in Maize Root Response to Salt Stress
Salt stress represents a significant abiotic factor that constrains maize growth. Epigenetic modifications play a crucial role in enabling plants to respond effectively to such stresses. Among these alterations, m<sup>6</sup>A methylation, which is the most common post-transcriptional modification of eukaryotic mRNA, shows dynamic variations that are closely linked to stress responses. In this study, we conducted a transcriptome-wide m<sup>6</sup>A methylation analysis on maize roots from the inbred line PH4CV, following treatment with 180 mM NaCl. The results identified 1309 differentially m<sup>6</sup>A methylated peaks (DMPs) and 2761 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under salt stress conditions. Association analysis revealed that 179 DEGs contain DMPs. Key pathways involved in stress responses, including Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling transduction and ABA signaling, as well as ion homeostasis regulation (involving AKT, HKT, and other families) and the reactive oxygen species scavenging system (including POD, SOD, and CAT), play crucial roles in coping with salt stress. Furthermore, we identified a total of 26 m<sup>6</sup>A-related genes, comprising 7 eraser genes, 10 reader genes, and 9 writer genes. Notably, several key salt-responsive genes, such as <i>RBOHB</i>, <i>AKT1</i>, <i>HKT1</i>, and <i>POD12</i>, are correlated with m<sup>6</sup>A modification. This study provides a comprehensive map of m<sup>6</sup>A methylation dynamics in maize roots under salt stress, laying a foundational resource for future investigations into the epigenetic regulation of salt tolerance in maize.
Authors
- L. Zhang
- Xiaojia Hao
- Wanling Ta
- Jianwen Bian
- Zhenping Ren
- Zelong Zhuang
- Yunling Peng
Institutions
- Gansu Agricultural University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Plants
- Published
- 2025-12-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010036
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- RNA modifications and cancer
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.81