“Do you belong in my circle?” – a retrospective reflexive thematic analysis of the particularity and price of solidarity for socioculturally diverse communities in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, calls for solidarity were widespread, yet its practice proved fragile and uneven. This study explores how individuals from socio-culturally diverse and often marginalized communities in the canton of Bern (Switzerland) experienced and enacted solidarity. Drawing on the conceptual works by Prainsack & Buyx and Komter, we conducted reflexive thematic analysis of seven focus group discussions with 53 participants and identified two central themes: (1) “ Commonality, gratitude and reciprocity as particularities of solidarity” , highlighting how shared values and mutual recognition shaped solidaristic practices; and (2) “Barriers, challenges and costs: the ticket to enter solidarity” , capturing affective labour, limitations of institutional solidarity, and conditions under which solidarity was withheld. Focusing on participants’ lived experiences, findings concentrate on three key insights: first, participants experienced positive aspects of solidarity—such as shared purpose and commonality—but these were often offset by emotional and social burdens; second, sociocultural and socioeconomic contexts fundamentally shaped who could afford the costs asscociated with solidaristic engagement; and third, institutional appeals to solidarity were insufficient to sustain collective action, failing to meet participants’ diverse needs and capacities. Solidarity was thus enacted in deeply situated and contingent ways, motivated by ethical and emotional imperatives, yet constrained by structural inequalities. The study underscores the need to consider both affective and socio-structural dimensions when fostering solidaristic practices, offering insights for developing context-specific and culturally responsive strategies to support collective action and social cohesion in times of crisis. • Solidarity has been a prominently featured concept during COVID-19 • Explores how solidarity was practised during COVID-19 in Bern, Switzerland • Reflexive thematic analysis of socio-culturally diverse communities’ perceptions • Identifies appreciation, commonality, and reciprocity as key solidarity drivers • Highlights emotional and structural barriers to sustained solidarity

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100697
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Do you belong in my circle?” – a retrospective reflexive thematic analysis of the particularity and price of solidarity for socioculturally diverse communities in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic

Annika Frahsa, Gia Thu Ly, Cristopher I.Kobler Betancourt, Balthasar L. Hug
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Cultural Differences and Values
article

“Do you belong in my circle?” – a retrospective reflexive thematic analysis of the particularity and price of solidarity for socioculturally diverse communities in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic

Annika Frahsa, Gia Thu Ly, Cristopher I.Kobler Betancourt, Balthasar L. Hug
article en

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, calls for solidarity were widespread, yet its practice proved fragile and uneven. This study explores how individuals from socio-culturally diverse and often marginalized communities in the canton of Bern (Switzerland) experienced and enacted solidarity. Drawing on the conceptual works by Prainsack & Buyx and Komter, we conducted reflexive thematic analysis of seven focus group discussions with 53 participants and identified two central themes: (1) “ Commonality, gratitude and reciprocity as particularities of solidarity” , highlighting how shared values and mutual recognition shaped solidaristic practices; and (2) “Barriers, challenges and costs: the ticket to enter solidarity” , capturing affective labour, limitations of institutional solidarity, and conditions under which solidarity was withheld. Focusing on participants’ lived experiences, findings concentrate on three key insights: first, participants experienced positive aspects of solidarity—such as shared purpose and commonality—but these were often offset by emotional and social burdens; second, sociocultural and socioeconomic contexts fundamentally shaped who could afford the costs asscociated with solidaristic engagement; and third, institutional appeals to solidarity were insufficient to sustain collective action, failing to meet participants’ diverse needs and capacities. Solidarity was thus enacted in deeply situated and contingent ways, motivated by ethical and emotional imperatives, yet constrained by structural inequalities. The study underscores the need to consider both affective and socio-structural dimensions when fostering solidaristic practices, offering insights for developing context-specific and culturally responsive strategies to support collective action and social cohesion in times of crisis. • Solidarity has been a prominently featured concept during COVID-19 • Explores how solidarity was practised during COVID-19 in Bern, Switzerland • Reflexive thematic analysis of socio-culturally diverse communities’ perceptions • Identifies appreciation, commonality, and reciprocity as key solidarity drivers • Highlights emotional and structural barriers to sustained solidarity

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 9
University of Bern (CH), University of Lucerne (CH), Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.