Encoding Effort Eliminates the Animacy Advantage in Memory When Manipulated with Value-Directed Remembering

People are more likely to remember words that refer to living/animate things than nonliving/inanimate things across various memory tasks, yielding an animacy advantage in recall. We tested an encoding-effort explanation for this effect: that people naturally devote more attention or encoding effort to living things over nonliving things during encoding, producing the effect. We used both between-participants (Experiment 1) and within-participants (Experiment 2) manipulations of value (i.e., participants earned a different number of points for each word they recalled) to affect encoding effort at the task and item level, respectively. We predicted that leading participants to devote more encoding effort to the items (in particular, the inanimate words) would reduce or even eliminate the animacy advantage, as has been found in some prior studies that used mental-imagery manipulations. Overall, participants recalled more animate words than inanimate words and recalled more words under higher-effort than under lower-effort conditions. In line with our predictions, these two factors interacted: the animacy effect was eliminated under higher-effort conditions, as these conditions led to an increase in the recall of inanimate words compared to animate words. The results therefore support an encoding-effort explanation for the animacy advantage in free-recall performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010030
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encoding Effort Eliminates the Animacy Advantage in Memory When Manipulated with Value-Directed Remembering

Julia N. Keiner, Nicolasa C. Villalobos, Michael J. Serra, T. D. Kelley
Behavioral Sciences
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Encoding Effort Eliminates the Animacy Advantage in Memory When Manipulated with Value-Directed Remembering

Julia N. Keiner, Nicolasa C. Villalobos, Michael J. Serra, T. D. Kelley
article en

Abstract

People are more likely to remember words that refer to living/animate things than nonliving/inanimate things across various memory tasks, yielding an animacy advantage in recall. We tested an encoding-effort explanation for this effect: that people naturally devote more attention or encoding effort to living things over nonliving things during encoding, producing the effect. We used both between-participants (Experiment 1) and within-participants (Experiment 2) manipulations of value (i.e., participants earned a different number of points for each word they recalled) to affect encoding effort at the task and item level, respectively. We predicted that leading participants to devote more encoding effort to the items (in particular, the inanimate words) would reduce or even eliminate the animacy advantage, as has been found in some prior studies that used mental-imagery manipulations. Overall, participants recalled more animate words than inanimate words and recalled more words under higher-effort than under lower-effort conditions. In line with our predictions, these two factors interacted: the animacy effect was eliminated under higher-effort conditions, as these conditions led to an increase in the recall of inanimate words compared to animate words. The results therefore support an encoding-effort explanation for the animacy advantage in free-recall performance.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(1)
University of Southern California (US), Texas Tech University (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.