Shared Family Care in the Netherlands:three programs and their outcomes

Within the Netherlands, several Shared Family Care programs have emerged in response to policy ambitions to reduce reliance on secure and other child-only residential placements, while strengthening family-centered, trauma-informed care. This chapter describes and compares three Dutch SFC programs – KINGS (a Dutch acronym for Child IN Healthy System), FamilyTotal, and the Expertise Center for Treatment and Assessment of Parenting and Psychiatry – that differ in target populations, duration, and balance between treatment and assessment, but share a two-generation focus on parents and children. Using longitudinal quantitative data, observational measures, and in-depth case material, we summarize outcomes across child, parent, and family domains. Overall, we observed improvements across several domains, including child and parental trauma-related symptoms, aspects of psychological functioning, parenting behavior, and family conditions. However, trajectories varied across families and programs, and the sustainability of change appeared sensitive to contextual stressors after discharge. By situating these findings within the Dutch residential youth care landscape and the international SFC typology, this chapter highlights both the potential and challenges of SFC as a family-centered alternative within contemporary child welfare systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Published
2025-12-19
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shared Family Care in the Netherlands:three programs and their outcomes

Emily Tang, Lysbert Zeinstra, Annemiek Harder, Erik J.; id_orcid 0000-0002-7139-9675 Knorth et al.
University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Shared Family Care in the Netherlands:three programs and their outcomes

Emily Tang, Lysbert Zeinstra, Annemiek Harder, Erik J.; id_orcid 0000-0002-7139-9675 Knorth, Anne-Fleur W. K. Vischer
article en

Abstract

Within the Netherlands, several Shared Family Care programs have emerged in response to policy ambitions to reduce reliance on secure and other child-only residential placements, while strengthening family-centered, trauma-informed care. This chapter describes and compares three Dutch SFC programs – KINGS (a Dutch acronym for Child IN Healthy System), FamilyTotal, and the Expertise Center for Treatment and Assessment of Parenting and Psychiatry – that differ in target populations, duration, and balance between treatment and assessment, but share a two-generation focus on parents and children. Using longitudinal quantitative data, observational measures, and in-depth case material, we summarize outcomes across child, parent, and family domains. Overall, we observed improvements across several domains, including child and parental trauma-related symptoms, aspects of psychological functioning, parenting behavior, and family conditions. However, trajectories varied across families and programs, and the sustainability of change appeared sensitive to contextual stressors after discharge. By situating these findings within the Dutch residential youth care landscape and the international SFC typology, this chapter highlights both the potential and challenges of SFC as a family-centered alternative within contemporary child welfare systems.

University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.