Soil sand content is a driving force in structuring bee communities

Abstract Floral and nesting resources are two major components of habitat specialization that drive patterns of bee distribution. However, nesting resources are largely understudied in comparison to floral resources. For nesting, bees are generally thought to prefer nesting in sandy soils, and numerous species are considered sand specialists. With little empirical evidence to date, we aimed to test how soil sand content and floral resource availability interact to affect patterns of bee distribution and whether sand specialist bees predominantly occur in sandy habitats. We set up a carefully designed observational study in Minnesota, USA, across three classes of soil sand content ( N = 28 plots) using a focal prairie plant species ( Dalea purpurea ) that attracts a wide range of bee species and can grow in different soil types. We identified three key results: (1) soil sand content, not floral resource availability, affected patterns of bee distribution; (2) contrary to expectations, sandier sites did not host the highest diversity of bee species; and (3) there was clear evidence of sand specialization for select bee species, but sand specialists were associated with both moderate and high amounts of sand rather than extremely sandy areas. Our findings highlight that soil properties, specifically soil sand content, can be important in driving patterns of bee distribution, specifically sand specialists. Therefore, not factoring soil properties into bee conservation and restoration decisions may limit our effectiveness and ability to support habitat specialists and rarer bee communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insect Conservation and Diversity
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.70051
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil sand content is a driving force in structuring bee communities

Marissa H. Chase, Zachary M. Portman, Ian G. Lane, Daniel P. Cariveau et al.
Insect Conservation and Diversity
Plant and animal studies
article

Soil sand content is a driving force in structuring bee communities

Marissa H. Chase, Zachary M. Portman, Ian G. Lane, Daniel P. Cariveau, Nicole Gerjets, Jessica D. Petersen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Floral and nesting resources are two major components of habitat specialization that drive patterns of bee distribution. However, nesting resources are largely understudied in comparison to floral resources. For nesting, bees are generally thought to prefer nesting in sandy soils, and numerous species are considered sand specialists. With little empirical evidence to date, we aimed to test how soil sand content and floral resource availability interact to affect patterns of bee distribution and whether sand specialist bees predominantly occur in sandy habitats. We set up a carefully designed observational study in Minnesota, USA, across three classes of soil sand content ( N = 28 plots) using a focal prairie plant species ( Dalea purpurea ) that attracts a wide range of bee species and can grow in different soil types. We identified three key results: (1) soil sand content, not floral resource availability, affected patterns of bee distribution; (2) contrary to expectations, sandier sites did not host the highest diversity of bee species; and (3) there was clear evidence of sand specialization for select bee species, but sand specialists were associated with both moderate and high amounts of sand rather than extremely sandy areas. Our findings highlight that soil properties, specifically soil sand content, can be important in driving patterns of bee distribution, specifically sand specialists. Therefore, not factoring soil properties into bee conservation and restoration decisions may limit our effectiveness and ability to support habitat specialists and rarer bee communities.

Insect Conservation and Diversity
University of Minnesota (US), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US)
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources, Nature Conservancy, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.