Evaluating the Physics and Repeatability of Human Brushers in Delivering Affective Touch

Research in affective touch often utilizes a pleasant stroking paradigm, with touch typically delivered at velocities between 0.3-30 cm/s and forces about 0.4 N. These values are derived from perceptual and physiological responses of touch receivers rather than natural behaviors of touchers. Herein, we observe untrained touchers in delivering pleasant touch as gentle strokes to a receiver's forearm through high-resolution force and position measurement using an instrumented brush. Twenty participants delivered about eleven strokes in each of five trials, yielding data on stroke velocity, force, duration, and length. The cohort deployed forces (0.37 N ± 0.24, 2 SD) near 0.4 N, but stroking velocities (13.7 cm/s ± 8.8, 2 SD) slightly higher than typically considered "optimal" (1-10 cm/s). We observed no correlation between stroke force and velocity, which led us to consider these factors jointly in characterizing an individual's brushing strategy. Moreover, while the cohort of participants exhibited a compact range of forces and velocities, individuals tended to occupy only subsets of this range with high repeatability across trials. Altogether, the findings suggest a need to further evaluate the velocity range between 10-30 cm/s and to jointly consider force, velocity, and consistency in characterizing an individual's brushing strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Haptics
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/toh.2025.3647371
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Physics and Repeatability of Human Brushers in Delivering Affective Touch

Afsaneh Doryab, G. J. Gerling, Zackary T. Landsman, Matthew Clark et al.
IEEE Transactions on Haptics
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Evaluating the Physics and Repeatability of Human Brushers in Delivering Affective Touch

Afsaneh Doryab, G. J. Gerling, Zackary T. Landsman, Matthew Clark, Seongkook Heo
article en

Abstract

Research in affective touch often utilizes a pleasant stroking paradigm, with touch typically delivered at velocities between 0.3-30 cm/s and forces about 0.4 N. These values are derived from perceptual and physiological responses of touch receivers rather than natural behaviors of touchers. Herein, we observe untrained touchers in delivering pleasant touch as gentle strokes to a receiver's forearm through high-resolution force and position measurement using an instrumented brush. Twenty participants delivered about eleven strokes in each of five trials, yielding data on stroke velocity, force, duration, and length. The cohort deployed forces (0.37 N ± 0.24, 2 SD) near 0.4 N, but stroking velocities (13.7 cm/s ± 8.8, 2 SD) slightly higher than typically considered "optimal" (1-10 cm/s). We observed no correlation between stroke force and velocity, which led us to consider these factors jointly in characterizing an individual's brushing strategy. Moreover, while the cohort of participants exhibited a compact range of forces and velocities, individuals tended to occupy only subsets of this range with high repeatability across trials. Altogether, the findings suggest a need to further evaluate the velocity range between 10-30 cm/s and to jointly consider force, velocity, and consistency in characterizing an individual's brushing strategy.

IEEE Transactions on HapticsVol. 19(1)
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.