Numerical Assessment of Thermal Performance in Hollow Clay Masonry: Continuous Insulation Layers versus Partial Cavity Fills

This study presents a comparative analysis of thermal retrofit strategies for hollow-clay-brick walls under high-intensity summer conditions. A numerical model coupling conduction, convection, and radiation simulates six configurations: an uninsulated wall, systems with 50 mm continuous extruded polystyrene (XPS) layers (external/internal), and full and partial cavity fills. The model is driven by a diurnal cycle with high ambient temperatures (25–45 °C) and significant solar irradiance. Results demonstrate a pronounced performance gradient. The continuous XPS layers are most effective, reducing thermal transmittance by 74% and providing superior dynamic performance. External XPS yields the largest thermal lag and smallest indoor swing while internal XPS offers comparable amplitude reduction. All cavity-fill strategies provide more modest U-value reductions (12–13%) and dynamic behavior similar to the reference wall. This work provides a critical dataset for selecting insulation strategies, concluding that continuous layers are optimal for peak performance, while cavity fills offer a viable supplementary or alternative solution where architectural constraints apply.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000070/pdf
Primary Topic
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Assessment of Thermal Performance in Hollow Clay Masonry: Continuous Insulation Layers versus Partial Cavity Fills

Mohammed Lahsaini, Muamer Kadic, Younes Achaoui, Sébastien Guenneau et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
article

Numerical Assessment of Thermal Performance in Hollow Clay Masonry: Continuous Insulation Layers versus Partial Cavity Fills

Mohammed Lahsaini, Muamer Kadic, Younes Achaoui, Sébastien Guenneau, Ahlam Alaoui
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of thermal retrofit strategies for hollow-clay-brick walls under high-intensity summer conditions. A numerical model coupling conduction, convection, and radiation simulates six configurations: an uninsulated wall, systems with 50 mm continuous extruded polystyrene (XPS) layers (external/internal), and full and partial cavity fills. The model is driven by a diurnal cycle with high ambient temperatures (25–45 °C) and significant solar irradiance. Results demonstrate a pronounced performance gradient. The continuous XPS layers are most effective, reducing thermal transmittance by 74% and providing superior dynamic performance. External XPS yields the largest thermal lag and smallest indoor swing while internal XPS offers comparable amplitude reduction. All cavity-fill strategies provide more modest U-value reductions (12–13%) and dynamic behavior similar to the reference wall. This work provides a critical dataset for selecting insulation strategies, concluding that continuous layers are optimal for peak performance, while cavity fills offer a viable supplementary or alternative solution where architectural constraints apply.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Numerical Assessment of Thermal Performance in Hollow Clay Masonry: Continuous Insulation Layers versus Partial Cavity Fills — Mohammed Lahsaini, Muamer Kadic, et al. · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS