Analysis of the Impact of logistical and geopolitical uncertainties (Red Sea, Strait of Malacca, Panama Canal) on the resilience of global maritime supply chain

Strategic maritime chokepoints—especially the Red Sea/Suez system, the Strait of Malacca, and the Panama Canal—concentrate a disproportionate share of seaborne trade and therefore transmit shocks widely when disrupted. From 2000 to 2025 the literature evolved from network/port-system perspectives (e.g., port regionalization, connectivity indices) to event-based impact assessments (piracy, canal blockages, climate-driven restrictions), complemented by operational metrics such as schedule reliability and delay days. This article integrates those strands in a hybrid framework (AIS trajectory analysis + connectivity indices + event studies) and shows that shocks at chokepoints materially degrade reliability, extend transit times, and inflate costs, yet the magnitude and duration of those impacts depend on network structure (redundancy), governance, and timely operational responses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000105/pdf
Primary Topic
Maritime Ports and Logistics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the Impact of logistical and geopolitical uncertainties (Red Sea, Strait of Malacca, Panama Canal) on the resilience of global maritime supply chain

Mohamed El Khaïli, Ourssoula Sikal, Abdellah Zamma
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Maritime Ports and Logistics
article

Analysis of the Impact of logistical and geopolitical uncertainties (Red Sea, Strait of Malacca, Panama Canal) on the resilience of global maritime supply chain

Mohamed El Khaïli, Ourssoula Sikal, Abdellah Zamma
article en

Abstract

Strategic maritime chokepoints—especially the Red Sea/Suez system, the Strait of Malacca, and the Panama Canal—concentrate a disproportionate share of seaborne trade and therefore transmit shocks widely when disrupted. From 2000 to 2025 the literature evolved from network/port-system perspectives (e.g., port regionalization, connectivity indices) to event-based impact assessments (piracy, canal blockages, climate-driven restrictions), complemented by operational metrics such as schedule reliability and delay days. This article integrates those strands in a hybrid framework (AIS trajectory analysis + connectivity indices + event studies) and shows that shocks at chokepoints materially degrade reliability, extend transit times, and inflate costs, yet the magnitude and duration of those impacts depend on network structure (redundancy), governance, and timely operational responses.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Maritime Ports and Logistics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.