Using Artificial Intelligence as a Risk Prediction Model in Patients with Equivocal Multiparametric Prostate MRI Findings

<b>Introduction:</b> PI-RADS 3 lesions represent a diagnostic grey zone on multiparametric MRI, with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detected in only 10-30%. Their equivocal nature leads to both unnecessary biopsies and missed cancers. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to provide objective, reproducible risk prediction. This review summarises current evidence on AI for risk stratification in patients with indeterminate mpMRI findings, including clarification of key multicentre initiatives such as the PI-CAI (Prostate Imaging-Artificial Intelligence) study-a global benchmarking effort comparing AI systems against expert radiologists. <b>Methods:</b> A narrative review of PubMed and Embase (search updated to August 2025) was conducted using terms including "PI-RADS 3", "radiomics", "machine learning", "deep learning", and "artificial intelligence." Eligible studies included those evaluating AI-based prediction of csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions using biopsy or long-term follow-up as reference standards. Both single-centre and multicentre studies were included, with emphasis on externally validated models. <b>Results:</b> Radiomics studies demonstrate that handcrafted features extracted from T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging can distinguish benign tissue from csPCa, particularly in the transition zone, with area-under-the-ROC curves typically 0.75-0.82. Deep learning approaches-including convolutional neural networks and large-scale representation-learning frameworks-achieve higher performance and can reduce benign biopsy rates by 30-40%. Models that integrate imaging-based AI with clinical predictors such as PSA density further improve discrimination. The PI-CAI study, the largest international benchmark to date (>10,000 MRI exams), shows that state-of-the-art AI systems can match or exceed expert radiologists for csPCa detection across diverse scanners, centres, and populations, though prospective validation remains limited. <b>Conclusions:</b> AI shows strong potential to refine management of PI-RADS 3 lesions by reducing unnecessary biopsies, improving csPCa detection, and mitigating inter-reader variability. Translation into routine practice will require prospective multicentre validation, harmonised imaging protocols, and integration of AI outputs into clinical workflows with clear thresholds, decision support, and safety-net recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010028
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Artificial Intelligence as a Risk Prediction Model in Patients with Equivocal Multiparametric Prostate MRI Findings

Marlon Perera, N. Lawrentschuk, David Hennes, E. Mazzone et al.
Cancers
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Using Artificial Intelligence as a Risk Prediction Model in Patients with Equivocal Multiparametric Prostate MRI Findings

Marlon Perera, N. Lawrentschuk, David Hennes, E. Mazzone, Eoin Dinneen, Abdullah Al-Khanaty, Sree Appu, Arjun Guduguntla, Damien Bolton, Renu S. Eapen, Declan G. Murphy, Carlos Delgado, Pablo Guerrero
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> PI-RADS 3 lesions represent a diagnostic grey zone on multiparametric MRI, with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detected in only 10-30%. Their equivocal nature leads to both unnecessary biopsies and missed cancers. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to provide objective, reproducible risk prediction. This review summarises current evidence on AI for risk stratification in patients with indeterminate mpMRI findings, including clarification of key multicentre initiatives such as the PI-CAI (Prostate Imaging-Artificial Intelligence) study-a global benchmarking effort comparing AI systems against expert radiologists. <b>Methods:</b> A narrative review of PubMed and Embase (search updated to August 2025) was conducted using terms including "PI-RADS 3", "radiomics", "machine learning", "deep learning", and "artificial intelligence." Eligible studies included those evaluating AI-based prediction of csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions using biopsy or long-term follow-up as reference standards. Both single-centre and multicentre studies were included, with emphasis on externally validated models. <b>Results:</b> Radiomics studies demonstrate that handcrafted features extracted from T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging can distinguish benign tissue from csPCa, particularly in the transition zone, with area-under-the-ROC curves typically 0.75-0.82. Deep learning approaches-including convolutional neural networks and large-scale representation-learning frameworks-achieve higher performance and can reduce benign biopsy rates by 30-40%. Models that integrate imaging-based AI with clinical predictors such as PSA density further improve discrimination. The PI-CAI study, the largest international benchmark to date (>10,000 MRI exams), shows that state-of-the-art AI systems can match or exceed expert radiologists for csPCa detection across diverse scanners, centres, and populations, though prospective validation remains limited. <b>Conclusions:</b> AI shows strong potential to refine management of PI-RADS 3 lesions by reducing unnecessary biopsies, improving csPCa detection, and mitigating inter-reader variability. Translation into routine practice will require prospective multicentre validation, harmonised imaging protocols, and integration of AI outputs into clinical workflows with clear thresholds, decision support, and safety-net recommendations.

CancersVol. 18(1)
Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia (AU), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), The University of Melbourne (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Hudson Institute of Medical Research (AU), Cabrini Hospital (AU), Prostate Cancer Research (GB), Austin Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.