Corn Plant Detection Using YOLOv9 Across Different Soil Background Colors, Growth Stages, and UAV Flight Heights

Accurate stand count and growth stage detection are essential for crop monitoring, since traditional methods often overlook field variability, leading to poor management decisions. This study evaluated the performance of the YOLOv9-small model for detecting and counting corn plants under real field conditions. The model was tested across three soil background types, two flight heights (30 and 70 m), and four corn growth stages (V2, V3, V5, and V6). Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery was collected from three distinct fields and cropped into 640 × 640 pixels. Datasets were split into training (70%), validation (20%), and testing (10%) datasets. Model performance was assessed using precision, recall, classification loss, and mean average precision of 50% and 50–90%. The results showed that the V3 and V5 stages yielded the highest detection accuracy, with mAP50 values exceeding 85% in conventional tillage fields and slightly lower performance in gray/red-brown conditions due to background interference. Increasing flight height to 70 m reduced accuracy by 8–12%, though precision remained high, particularly at V5, and performance was poorest for V2 and V6. In conclusion, YOLOv9-small is effective for early-stage corn detection, particularly at V3 and V5, with 30 m providing optimal results. However, 70 m may be acceptable at V5 to optimize mapping time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corn Plant Detection Using YOLOv9 Across Different Soil Background Colors, Growth Stages, and UAV Flight Heights

Lorena N. Lacerda, George Vellidis, Emily K. Bedwell, Adão Felipe dos Santos et al.
1 citations
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
article

Corn Plant Detection Using YOLOv9 Across Different Soil Background Colors, Growth Stages, and UAV Flight Heights

Lorena N. Lacerda, George Vellidis, Emily K. Bedwell, Adão Felipe dos Santos, Thiago O. C. Barboza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate stand count and growth stage detection are essential for crop monitoring, since traditional methods often overlook field variability, leading to poor management decisions. This study evaluated the performance of the YOLOv9-small model for detecting and counting corn plants under real field conditions. The model was tested across three soil background types, two flight heights (30 and 70 m), and four corn growth stages (V2, V3, V5, and V6). Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery was collected from three distinct fields and cropped into 640 × 640 pixels. Datasets were split into training (70%), validation (20%), and testing (10%) datasets. Model performance was assessed using precision, recall, classification loss, and mean average precision of 50% and 50–90%. The results showed that the V3 and V5 stages yielded the highest detection accuracy, with mAP50 values exceeding 85% in conventional tillage fields and slightly lower performance in gray/red-brown conditions due to background interference. Increasing flight height to 70 m reduced accuracy by 8–12%, though precision remained high, particularly at V5, and performance was poorest for V2 and V6. In conclusion, YOLOv9-small is effective for early-stage corn detection, particularly at V3 and V5, with 30 m providing optimal results. However, 70 m may be acceptable at V5 to optimize mapping time.

Remote SensingVol. 18(1)
Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR), University of Georgia (US), Kimberly-Clark (Canada) (CA), Kimberly-Clark (United States) (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.