Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis after Endovenous and Open Surgery for Varicose Veins: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BackgroundVaricose vein surgery increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is commonly used postoperatively, its efficacy and optimal regimen remain unclear. This study systematically reviews the effectiveness and safety of various anticoagulant strategies.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were screened and selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare different anticoagulant agents and prophylaxis durations indirectly. Additionally, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for VTE and bleeding outcomes.ResultsA total of 11 studies, including 7359 patients who underwent either endovenous or open surgical procedures for varicose veins, met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis results indicated that pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of VTE compared to no prophylaxis (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.12-1.99, <i>P</i> < 0.01); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, there was no significant difference in bleeding risk between patients who received anticoagulant prophylaxis and those who did not (RR = 2.03, 95% CI: 0.82-5.07, <i>P</i> = 0.81). Furthermore, network meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in the incidence of thromboembolic events or bleeding risk across various prophylaxis durations (3, 5, and 10 days) or among different anticoagulants, including low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), rivaroxaban, heparin, apixaban, and sulodexide.ConclusionsPostoperative anticoagulant prophylaxis for VTE following varicose vein surgery appears to be safe; however, its effectiveness in reducing VTE incidence remains uncertain. The lack of significant differences in outcomes across different prophylaxis durations and anticoagulant types highlights the need for further high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials to establish the optimal prophylactic strategy, including the appropriate agent, dosage, and duration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251410004
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis after Endovenous and Open Surgery for Varicose Veins: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Limei Yang, Jianjie Ju, Shuhua Ye, Jingjing Chen
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis after Endovenous and Open Surgery for Varicose Veins: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Limei Yang, Jianjie Ju, Shuhua Ye, Jingjing Chen
article en

Abstract

BackgroundVaricose vein surgery increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is commonly used postoperatively, its efficacy and optimal regimen remain unclear. This study systematically reviews the effectiveness and safety of various anticoagulant strategies.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were screened and selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare different anticoagulant agents and prophylaxis durations indirectly. Additionally, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for VTE and bleeding outcomes.ResultsA total of 11 studies, including 7359 patients who underwent either endovenous or open surgical procedures for varicose veins, met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis results indicated that pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of VTE compared to no prophylaxis (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.12-1.99, <i>P</i> < 0.01); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, there was no significant difference in bleeding risk between patients who received anticoagulant prophylaxis and those who did not (RR = 2.03, 95% CI: 0.82-5.07, <i>P</i> = 0.81). Furthermore, network meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in the incidence of thromboembolic events or bleeding risk across various prophylaxis durations (3, 5, and 10 days) or among different anticoagulants, including low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), rivaroxaban, heparin, apixaban, and sulodexide.ConclusionsPostoperative anticoagulant prophylaxis for VTE following varicose vein surgery appears to be safe; however, its effectiveness in reducing VTE incidence remains uncertain. The lack of significant differences in outcomes across different prophylaxis durations and anticoagulant types highlights the need for further high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials to establish the optimal prophylactic strategy, including the appropriate agent, dosage, and duration.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Fujian Medical University (CN), County Hospital (GB), Fujian Provincial Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.